Application of constitutional principles in judicial enforcement
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(1).56-64
Abstract
The subject. Constitutional principles as phenomenon that attracts increasing attention of researchers in the development of post-soviet national legal systems.
The purpose of the paper. The purpose of this study is to reveal the relationship between constitutional principles and law enforcement.
The methodology of the study. The author of the study used general scientific methods of cognition: analysis, synthesis, abstraction, as well as applied practical methods such as statistical and case-method. The research is also based on the regulatory legal acts and judicial practice, as well as on the opinions of representatives of legal science in the analyzing sphere.
The main results and scope of their application. There are several reasons for scientific attention to constitutional principles. On the one hand this is connected with the increasing interest in natural law, forms of its manifestation, in the crisis conditions of the development of modern States and societies. On the other hand, on the territory of the post-Soviet states, the sphere of law enforcement is at the stage of its reform, as are the national legal systems themselves. In this regard, the search for effective methods of improving legal institutions and law enforcement relations becomes urgent. This method, according to the author, could be natural law in such a form of its manifestation as constitutional and legal principle.
Constitutional principles as fundamental principles (ideas, requirements) fixed in the norms of law or followed from them. They reflect the essence of law and determine the content and procedure for the implementation of legal regulations in socially significant situations, determine the law enforcement sphere of the state. Judicial law enforcement is a complex process. As a result of their functioning a legal prescription as a model of behavior through the activities of a special subject - the court is embodied in real social relations.
Conclusions. The constitutional principles at various levels, from ideas to specific regulations, relating to state and society in general and specific to their individual institutions, serve as the basis of law enforcement. They determine judicial activities, the subjects of law enforcement, procedure, jurisdiction, establish its boundaries and a measure of its quality.
About the Author
Oksana N. ShupitskayaBelarus
PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of International Law
RSCI SPIN-code: 5222-9274
References
1. Avakyan S.A. Constitution of Russia: nature, evolution, modernity. Moscow, Sashko Publ., 2000. 528 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bondar’ N.S. Judicial constitutionalism in Russia in the light of constitutional justice. Moscow, Norma: INFRA-M Publ., 2011, 544 p. (In Russ.).
3. Gadzhiev G.A. Ontology of law. Moscow: Norma Publ., 2013. 320 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kokotov A.N. Constitutional Law in Russian law. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Current problems of Russian law, 2014, no. 10, pp. 2161–2168. (In Russ.).
5. Kruss V.I. Constitutionalization of law: foundations of theory. Moscow, Norma: Infra-M Publ., 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.).
6. Liverovskii A. A. Scientific consistency of prospects of constitutional universalization of norm control in the Russian Federation, in: Kruss V.I. (ed.). The Constitution, constitutionalism, and constitutionalization of legal systems: current correlation of concepts and trends. Tver’, Tver’ State University Publ., 2013. P. 221–226. (In Russ.).
7. Liverovskii A.A. On the delimitation of powers in the sphere of norm control between the bodies of constitutional justice and courts of general jurisdiction, in: The Constitution of the Russian Federation: social guidelines, practice of implementation. Barnaul, Altai University Publ., 2014. P. 42–45. (In Russ.).
8. Liverovskii A.A. Clarification of semantic concepts of constitutional norm control. Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost' = Law: history and modernity, 2018, no. 1, pp. 32–48. (In Russ.).
9. Taeva N.E. Norms of constitutional law in the system of legal regulation of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 2017. 352 p. (In Russ.).
10. Alekseev S.S. Theory of law. Moscow: BECK Publ., 1994. 224 p. (In Russ.).
11. Evans J.M. The principles of fundamental justice: the Constitution and the common law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 1991, vol. 29, no. 1, pp.51–92.
12. Alebastrova I.A. Constitutional principles: the form of expression, its place in the system of law and its sources. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo = Constitutional and municipal law, 2007, no. 8, pp. 12–17. (In Russ.).
13. Luchin V.O., Ebzeev B.S. (eds.). Constitutional law of Russia. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana Publ., 2018. 671 p. (In Russ.).
14. Baglay M.V. Constitutional law of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Norma: INFRA-M Publ., 2015. 767 p. (In Russ.).
15. Komkova G.V. The content of the system of constitutional law of Russia: modern reading. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Current problems of Russian law, 2018, no. 10(95), pp. 78–82. (In Russ.).
16. Kumm M. Who is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law. German Law Journal, 2006, vol. 07, no. 04, pp. 341–369.
17. Shusta R.M., Levine D.R., Harris P.R. Multicultural law enforcement: strategies for peacekeeping in a diverse society. New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1995. 464 p.
18. Skolnick J.H. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New Orleans, Quid Pro, LLC, 2011. 320 p.
19. Kazimirchuk V.P., Kudryavtsev V.N. Modern sociology of law. Textbook for universities. Moscow, Jurist Publ., 1995. 297 p. (In Russ.).
20. Chestnov I.L. Theoretical problems of law enforcement. Kriminalist = Criminalist, 2015, no. 2, pp. 76-79. (In Russ.).
21. Dicey A.V. The Law of the Constitution. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013. 925 p.
Review
For citations:
Shupitskaya O.N. Application of constitutional principles in judicial enforcement. Law Enforcement Review. 2020;4(1):56-64. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(1).56-64