Civil and tax law: vice versa
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(1).65-74
Abstract
The subject of the research is the correlation of civil and tax law institutions in the scope of legal nature of such social relations.
The purpose of the article is to confirm or refute the hypothesis that when qualifying civil legal relations with tax elements, the law enforcement officer should proceed from the priority of analysis of tax legislation over civil legislation.
Methodology. Methods of analysis and synthesis are used. The scientific analysis focuses on decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of general jurisdiction.
The main results and scope of their application. The influence of civil law on tax law is carried out at the level of law-making and law enforcement. We study the law enforcement paradigms that are relevant for law enforcement activities. The current tasks of tax law-making are emphasized. Establishing the influence of tax law institutions on civil law allows us to improve some civil law institutions, create a comprehensive theory of the relationship of these legal phenomena, see trends in their development and, of course, outline ways to develop tax legislation in the aspect of tax law autonomy. The legislator should strive for maximum unification of legal terminology in tax and civil legislation so that subjects of legal relations feel legally comfortable and easily construct civil transactions based on the predicted tax consequences. Subjects of civil legal relations, before entering into certain civil transactions, should already plan their tax consequences in advance focusing not only on civil legislation, but also on tax legislation, in particular, on the classification of transactions as investment or non- investment.
Conclusions. The impact of tax law on civil law is multidimensional. At least, we can talk about the impact on the levels of law-making, law enforcement, and the use of civil law institutions. When qualifying civil legal relations with tax elements, the analysis of tax legislation in comparison with civil legislation has priority.About the Author
Marina V. Sentsova (Karaseva)
Voronezh State University, Voronezh
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Worker of Higher School of Russia; Head, Department of Financial Law
RSCI SPIN-code: 9679-4429; AuthorID: 337945
References
1. Volkova N.N. Reception of civil law norms in tax legislation. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2008. 22 p. (In Russ.).
2. Karaseva M.V. Civil law determination of tax law: concept and essential conditionality. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and law, 2013, no. 7, pp. 36–45. (In Russ.).
3. Petrova G.V. General theory of tax law. Moscow, FBK-Press Publ., 2004. 224 p. (In Russ.).
4. Chelyshev M.Yu. Interaction of civil and tax law in regulating relations with the participation of entrepreneurs. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2014. 158 p. (In Russ.).
5. Rosmarin S. Prawo podatkowe a prawo priwatne w swetle wykladne prawa. Lwow, Towarzystwo Naukowe, 1939. 308 s. (In Polish).
6. Karaseva M.V. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of March 24, 2017 No. 9-P in the "mirror" of tax law. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya = Journal of constitutional justice, 2018, no. 1, pp. 14–17. (In Russ.).
7. Ryabov A.A. Influence of civil law on tax relations. Moscow. Norma, Infra-M Publ., 2014. 224 p. (In Russ.).
8. Smolitskaya E.E. Civil law institutions, concepts and terms in tax law. Moscow, Prospect Publ., 2018. 174 p. (In Russ.).
9. Bagayev V. "Civilized divorce" of tax and civil law. Zakon.ru. The first social network for lawyers. https://zakon.ru/blog/2013/11/30/civilizovannyj_razvod_nalogovogo_i_grazhdanskogo_prava__na_konferencii_v_spbgu_vernulis_k_ekonomiche (In Russ.).
10. Karaseva M.V., Bogach R. Tax and legal terminology in the context of civil legislation in Russia and the Czech Republic. Vestnik VGU. Seriya Pravo = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 2015, no. 2, pp. 68–74. (In Russ.).
11. Karaseva (Sentsova) M.V. Significance of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in 2009 for the development of the theory of tax law, in: Pepelyaev S.G. (ed.). Tax law in the decisions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in 2009. Moscow, 2011. P. 58–59. (In Russ.).
12. Gassner W. Interpretation und Anwerndung der Steuergesetze [Interpretation and appreciation of tax laws]. Wien, Orac, 1972. XLII, 142 S. (In Germ.).
13. Krasyukov A.V. Unjustified enrichment in the mechanism of indirect taxation. Finansovoe pravo = Financial law, 2013, no. 6, pp. 30–33. (In Russ.).
14. Karaseva M.V. Tax and civil law: alternatives, alignments, transformations. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii = Russian journal of legal research, 2017, no. 12, pp. 35–42. (In Russ.).
15. Brook B.Ya. Unjust enrichment as an expense for profit tax purposes: the economic approach prevailed. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskaya Federatsiya = Bulletin of economic justice of the Russian Federation, 2015, no. 11, pp. 8–12 (In Russ.).
16. Bartoshek M., Roman law. Concept, terms, definitions. Moscow, Jurid. Lit, 1989. 448 p. (In Russ.).
17. Mikhailov V.S. On the question of the admissibility of reimbursement of expenses incurred regardless of the fact of causing harm. Zakon = Law, 2019, no. 3, pp. 67-79. (In Russ.).
18. Tokawski W., Lasinski-Sulecki K. Unjust enrichment In Tax Cases judged by Court of Justice, in: Kostyukov A.N. (ed.). Problems of application of tax law in Central and Eastern European countries. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2013. P. 265–273.
19. Pakalnishkis V. Theoretical issues of interaction between private and public law, in: Karaseva M.V. (ed.). Contemporary problems of public law. Russia-Lithuania. Voronezh, Voronezh State University Publ., 2007. P. 14-15. (In Russ.).
20. Karkhalev D.N. Protective civil relationship. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2009. 332 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sentsova (Karaseva) M.V. Civil and tax law: vice versa. Law Enforcement Review. 2020;4(1):65-74. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(1).65-74
Views:
535
Email this article 