Electronic platform operators as participants of tax relations in the digital era (the case of professional income tax)

The subject. The research concerns analysis of legal status of a new participant of tax relations in the digital era - an operator of electronic platform.
The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that operators of electronic platforms are participants of tax relations and their rights and obligations must be described in tax legislation.
The research methodology includes an interpretation of tax legislation, other legal acts governing the legal status of operators of electronic platforms, analysis of rights and obligations of other participants of tax relations.
The main results and scope of their application. Due to the lack of an unambiguous definition of the legal status of operators of electronic platforms, obstacles are existed in the use of the transactional principle to taxation in case of professional income tax in Russia. Administration of this tax implies a complete absence of tax reporting as well as an unusual moment of the payment of this tax - at the time of the transaction, when self-employed taxpayer receives payment for his services by a consumer. This mechanism eliminates the unnecessarily complicated process of notifying the tax authorities about such transactions, but implies additional obligations to the operators of electronic platforms and the taxpayers themselves. It actualizes the necessity of detailed description of legal status of the operators of electronic platforms in tax legislation.
Conclusions. The legal status of operators of electronic platforms in terms of belonging to the participants in tax relations already provided for in the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is not defined. Although they act as intermediaries in calculating and paying professional income tax. Such a lack creates a number of practical problems and does not contribute to the development of a transactional approach to taxation. At the present stage, it would be logical to recognize the operators of electronic platforms as tax representatives of taxpayers or withholding agents. According to the further development of the technical capabilities of tax administration, operators of electronic platforms may become a new participants of tax relations, who are conventionally called by the author «technological intermediaries».

1. Burman L.E., Gale W.G., Gault S. et al. Financial Transaction Taxes in Theory and Practice. National Tax Journal, 2016, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 171-216. DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2016.1.06

2. Besley T.J., Rosen H.S. Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis. National Tax Journal, 1999, vol.52, no. 2, pp. 157-178.

3. Mikesell J. State Retail Taxes in 2012: The Recovery Continues. State Tax Notes, 2013, June, pp. 1001-1003

4. Lyutov N.L., Voitkovskaya I.V. Taxi drivers performing work through online platforms: what are the legal implications of “uberizing” labor? Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 149-159. (In Russ).

5. Lyutov N.L. Transformation of labor relations into new forms of employment in the digital economy. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 7, pp. 115-130. (In Russ).

6. Lyutov N.L. Adaptation of labor law to the development of digital technologies: challenges and prospects. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 98-107. (In Russ).

7. Filipova I.A. Transformation of legal regulation of labor in a digital society. Artificial intelligence and labor law. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N.I. Lobachevsky Publ., 2019. 89 p. (In Russ).

8. Chesalina O.V. Work through Internet platforms as a challenge to labor relations. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom = Labor law in Russia and abroad, 2019, no. 1, pp. 12-15. (In Russ).

9. Shuraleva S.V. Workers in the "clouds": the impact of Internet platforms on the development of labor relations. Trudovoe pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom = Labor law in Russia and abroad, 2019, no. 1, pp. 15-18. (In Russ).

10. Mikhailov A.V. Prospects for the development of legislation on entrepreneurial activity in the digital economy. Predprinimatel'skoe pravo = Entrepreneurial Law. Application "Law and Business", 2019, no. 3, pp. 7-13. (In Russ).

11. Kopina A.A. Tax experiments. Nalogi = Taxes (Newspaper), 2018, no. 19, pp. 1, 3-4. (In Russ).

12. Kopina A.A. New special tax regime for individuals - tax on professional income. Nalogi = Taxes (Newspaper), 2018, no. 20, pp. 1, 3-8. (In Russ).

13. Ruchkina G.F. New special tax regimes in the legislation of the Russian Federation as the implementation of the public interests of the state. Nalogi = Taxes, 2019, no. 1, pp. 28-33. (In Russ).

14. Tropskaya S.S. Taxation of the Self-Employed and the Digital Economy: Tax on Professional Income. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2019, no. 5, pp. 22-26. (In Russ).

15. Shuvaev E.A. The status of a citizen registered as self-employed and the problems of taxation of income of self-employed persons. Electronic Supplement to Russian Juridical Journal, 2019, no. 2, pp. 66 - 72. (In Russ).

16. Migacheva E.V. Tax control in the context of digital economy development. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2018, no. 8, pp. 21-25. (In Russ).

17. Rodygina V.E. Digitalization of VAT Tax Control: Legal Consequences and Prospects. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 29-32. (In Russ).

18. Vinnitskiy D.V. Subjects of tax law. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2000. 192 p. (In Russ).

19. Tyutin D.V. Tax law: a course of lectures. Moscow, Consultant Plus, 2017. (In Russ).

20. Zhilin D.M. Systems theory. Experience in building a course. Moscow, URSS, Lenand, 2017. 176 p. (In Russ).

21. Dementyev I.V. Tax Law Enforcement: Change of Legal Paradigms. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 96-106. (In Russ).

22. Demin A.V. Discretion in tax law. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2017, no. 35, pp. 42-55. (In Russ).

23. Kucheryavenko N.P. Features of discretion in tax and legal regulation, in: Public Law Yearbook 2017: Discretion and Valuation Concepts in Administrative Law. Moscow, Infotropic Media, 2017. Pp. 45-63. (In Russ).

24. Khavanova I.A. Tax jurisdiction: facets of the possible and delayed risks Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 12, pp. 81-91. (In Russ).

25. Khwang L.B. Administrative discretion in tax legal relations (based on the materials of the Republic of Uzbekistan), in: Public Law Yearbook 2017: Discretion and Valuation Concepts in Administrative Law. Moscow, Infotropic Media, 2017. Pp. 161-189. (In Russ).