Public danger of crime: the concept and criteria of verification

The subject. The article reveals theoretical, lexical and logical approaches to determining the essence of the public danger of crime.
The purpose of the article is to confirm or dispute hypothesis that the public danger of crime as a legal or theoretical construction represents the possibility of negative changes in society; public danger is an exclusive social feature of criminal acts. The authors also aim to develop a system of verifiable criteria for public danger.
The methodology of the research is an objective assessment of the public danger as legal category. It is performed selecting a system of verified factors of public danger on the basis of analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, interpretation of legal literature.
The main results, scope of application. The meaning of the legal definition of a crime contains the purpose of preventing possible harm to society stipulated in the criminal law. This fact is due to the preventive task (part 1 of article 2 of the Russian Criminal Code). The public danger of crime as a phenomenon of objective reality is meaningless, since the crime is the negative changes and harm that has occurred. The social danger of crime creates a shock to the foundations of society, undermines the conditions of its existence. Other ("non-criminal") offenses that contradict the established law and order in the state do not threaten the basic system of social values. Intersectoral differentiation of legal responsibility should have transitivity, which includes a rule: the degree of repression of coercive measures within various branches of law meets the rules of hierarchy. Mandatory signs of public danger of a crime are that the act: 1) affects significant social relations that need criminal legal protection from causing harm to them by socially dangerous behavior; 2) has a harmful potential that is fraught with causing significant harm or creating a threat of causing such harm to the object of criminal legal protection; 3) results in socially dangerous consequences; 4) is characterized by the guilty attitude of the subject to the deed, expressed in the form of intent or carelessness. Optional criteria of public danger of act are: the characteristics of the crime and characteristics of victim; method of committing a crime; the time, place, atmosphere, instruments and means of committing the crime; the motive; the object of the crime; special characteristics of the perpetrator. The quantitative indicators (size, severity, or other value) of the subject of the offense and its socially dangerous consequences, as well as the repetition of the act and the presence of a special recidivism of crimes should not be used as criteria for public danger of behavior.
Conclusions. Public danger is a social feature exclusively of criminal acts (crimes and potential criminal misdemeanors); all other types of offenses are harmful to the interests of society, but they do not pose a danger to it. To exclude competition between criminal and administrative responsibility, it is necessary to take into account the public danger of the crime on the basis of verifiable factors.

1. Ponyatovskaya T.G. Conceptual foundations of criminal law: history and modernity: author. Doct. Diss. Thesis. Yekaterinburg, 1997. 34 p. (In Russ).

2. Rozhnov A.P. Does Russian law need a category of public danger? Pravovaya paradigma = Legal Concept, 2017, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 38-42. (In Russ).

3. Semchenkov I.P. Recognition of public danger as a constructive feature of the concept of crime is methodologically untenable. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the Kaliningrad branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Russia, 2019, no. 1, pp. 4144. (In Russ).

4. Klenova T.V. Public danger-the true property of crime. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal, 2013, no. 2, pp. 136-144. (In Russ).

5. Kuznetsova N.F. Crime and criminality, in Kuznetsova N.F. Selected works. Saint Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2003. 834 p. (In Russ).

6. Shapiro S.P. Collaring the crime, not the criminal: reconsidering the concept of white-collar crime. American Sociological Review, 1990, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 346-365. DOI: 10.2307/2095761.

7. Innes M., Fielding N., Cope N. The appliance of science? The theory and practice of crime intelligence analysis. The British Journal of Criminology, 2005, vol. 45, iss. 1, pp. 39-57.

8. Hamdorf K. The concept of a joint criminal enterprise and domestic modes of liability for parties to a crime: a comparison of German and English law. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2007, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 208-210.

9. Millie A. Anti-social behaviour, behavioural expectations and an urban aesthetic. British Journal of Criminology, 2008, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 379-394.

10. Piontkovskiy A.A. The doctrine of crime in Soviet criminal law. Course of Soviet criminal law: General part. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1961. 666 p. (In Russ).

11. Naumov A.V. Russian criminal law. General part. Moscow, BEK Publ., 1996. 560 p. (In Russ).

12. Razgildiev B.T. (ed.). Russian Criminal law: course of lectures. Vol. 1, book 1. Saratov: Publishing house of the Saratov State Academy of Law, 2004. 320 p. (In Russ).

13. Maltsev V.V. Socially dangerous behavior in criminal law. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2014. 646 p. (In Russ).

14. Kozlov A.P. The concept of crime. Saint Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004. 819 p. (In Russ).

15. Sotskov F.N. Public danger of an act in the criminal law of Russia. Cand. Diss. Moscow, 2009. 176 p. (In Russ).

16. Grebenkin F. Public danger of crime and its characteristics. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal law, 2006, no. 1, pp. 22-26. (In Russ).

17. Lobanova L.V. Dimension of public danger of an act as the basis for intersectoral and branch differentiation of legal responsibility. Logos et Praxis, 2017, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 126-133. (In Russ).

18. Gerasimov A.M. Public danger of crime: concept, structure, essential characteristics // Mir yuridicheskoi nauki, 2018, no. 8, pp. 45-56. (In Russ).

19. Lopashenko N.A. Fundamentals of criminal law impact. Saint Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004. 339 p. (In Russ).

20. Prozumentov L.M. Criminalization and decriminalization of acts. Tomsk, Tomsk University Publishing house, 2012. 142 p. (In Russ).

21. Demidov Yu.A. Social value and assessment in criminal law. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1975. 182 p. (In Russ).

22. Kobzeva E.V. Discretional signs in the criminal law. Saratov, Publishing house of the Saratov State Academy of Law, 2004. 228 p. (In Russ).

23. Malinovskiy A. A. Discretional concepts in legislation, in: Baranov V.M. (ed.). Lawmaking technique of modern Russia: state, problems, improvement. Vol. 1. Nizhnyi Novgorod, Niepoligraph Publ., 2001. P. 268-272. (In Russ).

24. Kashanina T. V. Discretional concepts in Soviet law. Cand. Diss. Thesis. Sverdlovsk, 1974. 17 p. (In Russ).

25. Beccaria C. On crimes and punishments. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2004, 184 p. (In Russ).

26. Zhalinskiy A.E. Selected works. Vol. 4: Legal thinking and professional activity of a lawyer. Scientific problems of law. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ., 2016, 584 p. (In Russ).

27. Markuntsov S.A. Theory of criminal law prohibition: diss. Doct. Diss. Moscow, 2015. 550 p. (In Russ).

28. Zaplatynskyi V. The new concept of the most general term «danger», in: Bezpecnost, extremizmus, teroriz-mus 2012: Medzinarodna vedecka konferencia: Zbormk prednasok : 13. - 14. decembra 2012 Podhajska, Slovenska republika. 1. vyd. - 1. vyd. - Podhajska: EEDA Vychodoeuropska agentura pre rozvoj, 2013.. P. 267-278. (In Russ).

29. Pudovochkin Yu.E. Problems of the political in crime and the criminal in politics (methodological reflections). Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal, 2013, no. 2, pp. 3-7. (In Russ).

30. Prokhorov V.S. Concept of crime and classification of crimes, in: Lukyanov V.V., Prokhorov V.S., Metelkova V.F. (eds.). Criminal law of Russia. General part. St. Petersburg, SPBU Publishing house, 2013, 596 p. (In Russ).

31. Bochkarev S.A. On the nature of public danger of crime. Pravovedenie, 2009, no. 5, pp. 93-102. (In Russ).

32. Dessecker A. Dangerousness, long prison terms, and preventive measures in Germany. Champ Penal = Penal Field, 2009, vol. VI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/champpenal.7508.

33. Baker E. Dangerousness, Rights and Criminal Justice. The Modem Law Review, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 528-547.

34. Lyapunov Yu.I. Public danger of an act as a universal category of Soviet criminal law. Moscow, Izdatelstvo VYuZSh MVD SSSR, 1989. 119 p. (In Russ).

35. Mitskevich A.V. (ed.). The Role of legal education in the prevention of offenses. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1985. 238 p. (In Russ).

36. Yavich L.S. The essence of the law. Leningrad, Publishing house of Leningrad University, 1985. 207 p. (In Russ).

37. Samoshchenko I.S. The concept of an offense under Soviet law. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1963. 286 p. (In Russ).

38. Shishov O.F. On the differentiation of crimes and administrative misdemeanors in Soviet law. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1961, no. 6, pp. 62-65. (In Russ).

39. Konstantinov P.Yu., Solovyova A.K., Stukanov A.P. Interrelation of administrative offenses and crimes. Pravovedenie, 2005, no. 3, pp. 58-74.v

40. Cass R.A. Overcriminalization: Administrative Regulation, Prosecutorial Discretion and the Rule of Law. Engage, 2015, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-26.

41. Simons K.W. The Crime/Tort Distinction: Legal Doctrine and Normative Perspectives. Widener Law Journal, 2008, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 731-732.

42. Zhalinskiy A.E. Assessment of the public danger of an act in the process of criminal law-making, in: Criminal law: development strategy in the XXI century: mater. 6-th international conference. scientific-practical Conf. (January 29-30, 2009). Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009. P. 48-52. (In Russ).