Russia: property and state. The history of post-Soviet law enforcement (Part II)
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(1).5-15
Abstract
The subject. The relevance of the article is stipulated by the gap in the study of property and the state as a consistent system. The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis that each way of organizing property such as private, mixed (corporate) and general (collective) potentially stimulates the existence of a certain state structure. The methodology. The author uses normative structuralism. This methodology is created by the author and is based on the idea that property as the main system-forming goal of the state’s existence predetermines principles of rationing its structure genetically. The main results of the research. Each way of organizing property in a particular social time period can acquire the quality of the main backbone in the organization structure of the state. Each way of organizing property provides proper social function: private way of organizing property provides function of social development; mixed (corporate) way provides function of social compromise (convergence); general (collective) way provides function of social security in the broadest sense. If private way of organizing property genetically programmed for the production and reproduction of social competition, mixed (corporate) and common (collective) ways are determined by the idea of its limitations and leveling. When the private way of organizing property becomes the main system-forming one it begins to fully stimulate the existence of a democratic structure of state organization. In turn, when mixed (corporate) and common (collective) ways of organizing property become the main system-forming ones, they stimulate the existence of a wide structural range of state functioning: from various regimes of democratic orientation to specific non-democratic regimes. Conclusions. The study of property as the main system-forming goal of the state existence through the normative structuralism concept allows us to conclude that that each way of organizing property stimulates the existence of a certain state structure.
About the Author
A. V. Butakov
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Butakov – Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law Dostoevsky
55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077
RSCI SPIN-code: 9843-0789;
AuthorID: 683256
References
1. Avak'yan S. The Starting Point is the Nation, in: Polyakov L. V. (comp.) PRO suverennuyu demokratiyu. Moscow, Europa Publ., 2007. P. 333–247. (In Russ.).
2. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson. D. A. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Moscow, AST Publ., 2016. 693 p. (In Russ.).
3. Alekseeva I.Yu., Alekseev A.P. What kind of post-capitalism does Russia need? Voprosy filosofii, 2014, no. 10, pp. 14–24. (In Russ.).
4. Brzezinsky Z. «The Grand Chessboard». Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ., 1999. 254 p. (In Russ.).
5. Brzezinsky Z. Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. Moscow, AST Publ., 2015. 288 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kissinger H. World Order. Moscow, AST Publ., 2015. 511 p. (In Russ.).
7. Baburin S.N. Integrational constitutionalism. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2020. 264 p. (In Russ.).
8. Butakov A.V. Exploring the latest history of Russian statehood: Transit. Omsk, Omskaya oblastnaya tipografiya, 2016. 416 p. (In Russ.).
9. Butakov A.V. Exploring the latest history of Russian statehood: Property and the state. The universal and the individual. Omsk, Omskaya oblastnaya tipografiya, 2018. 416 p. (In Russ.).
10. Kostyukov A.N. About law enforcement in modern Russia. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2017, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 159–172. (In Russ.).
11. Avrutin Yu.E. On the methodology of constitutional and legal research of economics. Pravovedenie, 2008, no. 1, pp. 71–85. (In Russ.).
12. Pastuhov V.B. At the constitutional line... Challenges and responses of Russian constitutionalism. Polis, 2013, no. 1, pp. 7–31. (In Russ.).
13. Kondrashev A.A. Russian Constitution: defects of adoption and content. Reformation, amendments or revision? Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2016, no. 2, pp. 32–41. (In Russ.).
14. Panaeva V.V. Criteria for restricting human and civil rights in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 14–25. (In Russ.).
15. Pisarev A.N. From the collectivist liberal democracy the transitional state of the Russian state and society: constitutional-legal aspects. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2016, no. 12, pp. 88–91. (In Russ.).
16. Rubanik V.E. On the originality and uniqueness of the Russian tradition of property rights. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava = History of State and Law, 2009, no. 12, pp. 19–22. (In Russ.).
17. Aleynikov B.N. Social state and property. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2008, no. 1, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.).
18. Kovalev A.M. Problems of private property, exploitation and alienation of labor in society and their future. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, 2006, no. 5, pp. 3–20. (In Russ.).
19. Grudtsyna L.Yu. Private property and civil society in Russia. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2008, no. 11, pp. 33–40. (In Russ.).
20. Chicherin B.N. Property and state. Saint-Petersburg, RHGA Publ., 2005. 822, [1] p. (In Russ.).
21. Alexander J. Power, politics and the civil sphere. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2009, no. 10, pp. 3–17. (In Russ.).
22. Badovskiy D. The vertical of power during the decline of stability, in: Polyakov L. V. (comp.) PRO suverennuyu demokratiyu. Moscow, Europa Publ., 2007. P. 517–525. (In Russ.).
23. Biryukov N.I. The genesis of statehood in post-Soviet Russia. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava = History of State and Law, 2006, no. 5, pp. 11–12. (In Russ.).
24. Vasilenko A.V. The modern Russian state (early XXI century): the circuits of ideology. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2009, no. 6, pp. 12–19. (In Russ.).
25. Ioyrysh A.I., Terent'ev V.G. Is the creation of state corporations justified as a tool for enhancing Russia's industrial policy? Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2009, no. 7, pp. 47–53. (In Russ.).
26. Kiva A.V. Russia: The Road to Disaster or to Modernization? Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2010, no. 11, pp. 133–143. (In Russ.).
27. Cohen S. Question of questions: Why did the Soviet Union end? Moscow, AIRO-XXI Publ.; Saint-Petersburg, Dmitriy Bulanin Publ., 2007. 200 p. (In Russ.).
28. Krevel'd M.V. The rise and decline of the state. Moscow, IRISJEN Publ., 2006. 542, [1] p. (In Russ.).
29. Lee Kuan Yew. From the Third World to the First. The Singapore Story. 1965–2000. Moscow, Al'pina Publisher, 2011. 656 p. (In Russ.).
30. Mamut L.S. Self-identification of the state. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2012, no. 7, pp. 92–95. (In Russ.).
31. Mamut L.S. Modern Russian statehood and culture of democracy. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2009, no. 1, pp. 5–14. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Butakov A.V. Russia: property and state. The history of post-Soviet law enforcement (Part II). Law Enforcement Review. 2021;5(1):5-15. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(1).5-15
Views:
526
Email this article 