“Statute on Siberian provincial administration” of 1822: the first experience of codification by Michael Speransky

The subject. The article examines the reform of local government in Siberia carried out by the outstanding Russian statesman and reformer M.M. Speransky in the first quarter of the 19th century. The purpose of the article is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis that the “Statute on Siberian provincial administration” of 1822 formed the organizational structure of state administration in Siberia for almost a century as well as basis for future codifications of Russian legislation that would carry out by M. Speransky. The methodological basis of the research is combination of objectivity, historicism and alternativeness, which presuppose an unbiased approach in the analysis of the historical problems and a critical attitude towards the sources. The main results, scope of application. The “Statute on Siberian provincial administration” of 1822 was the first systematization of local legislation in the history of Russia. The Statute became the first practical experience in the preparation of a code of laws for M.M. Speransky and his collaborators. The Statute was ahead of the subsequent imperial codification and incorporation of legislation carried out under his leadership. The Speransky’s reform in Siberia in 1822 determined the foundations of the administrative-territorial structure of the Trans-Ural region of the country, which corresponded to the needs of the time. The Statute of 1822 also legitimized the volost public administration of the Siberian state peasants, which was organized in the last quarter of the 18th century. This system of administration put the peasant self-government under more strict control by the district police authorities. Particular attention in the article is paid to the structure, nature and organizational and legal issues of the activities of local government in Siberia. Conclusions. The increased interest in the establishment and development of Siberian regional governance is associated not only with the desire of researchers to look deeper into the past, but also with practical needs. Today it is necessary to research the events and facts of the Siberian past in a new way so as not to repeat old myths and delusions and to prevent the emergence of new ones.

1. Dameshek L.M., Dameshek I.L. Pertseva T.A., Remnev A.V. M. M. Speransky: The Siberian version of Imperial Regionalism (to the 180th anniversary of the Siberian reform of M. M. Speransky). Irkutsk: Publishing House of the Irkutsk University, 2003. 246 p. (In Russ.).

2. Vagin V.I. Historical information about the activities of Count M. M. Speransky in Siberia from 1819 to 1822. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, Emperor’s Chancellery typography, 1872. (In Russ.).

3. Notes of Alexander Mikhailovich Turgenev. Russkaya starina, 1895, vol. 83, iss. 6, pp. 39–46. (In Russ.).

4. Konovalov I. A. The role and place of the general police in the system of local government in Siberia (XVIII — early XX century). Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2020. 311 p. (In Russ.).

5. Dameshek L.M., Kodan S.V., Shavrov A.V. Materials of the Gendarmerie Audits of 1828-1832 as a source for studying the Activities of the Siberian Administrative Apparatus, in: Romodanovskaya E.K (ed.). Istochniki po istorii obshchestvennoj mysli i kul'tury epohi pozdnego feodalizma. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1988. Pp. 84–95. (In Russ.).

6. Dmitriev-Mamonov A.I., Golodnikov K.M. (comp.). Memorial book of the Tobolsk province for 1884. Tobol'sk, Tobolsk Provincial Statistical Committee Publ., 1884. 530 p. (In Russ.).

7. Prutchenko S.M. Siberian suburbs. Regional institutions associated with the Siberian Institution of 1822, in the system of the Russian state governance. Historical and legal essays. St.Petersburg, A.S. Suvorin typography, 1899. 405 p. (In Russ.).

8. Konovalov I. A. Formation of the Siberian police bureaucracy in the 18th century. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2018, no. 428, pp. 112–117. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/428/15 (In Russ.).

9. Remnev A.V. Autocracy and Siberia. Administrative policy in the first half of the 19th century. Omsk, OmSU Publ., 1995. 237 p. (In Russ.).

10. Dameshek I.L. Siberia in the System of Imperial Regionalism (comparative study of the borderland policy of Russia in the first half of the 19th century). Irkutsk, Ottisk Publ., 2002. 208 p. (In Russ.).

11. Konovalov I.A., Tolochko A. P. Local governance in the cities of Siberia according to “Institution” of 1822. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya = Tomsk State University Journal of History, 2019, no. 60, pp. 17–21. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/60/3 (In Russ.).

12. Remnev A.V. Siberia in the Imperial geography of power of the 19th-early 20th centuries. Omsk, OmSU Publ., 2015. 580 p. (In Russ.).

13. Gessen V.M. Local government issues. St. Petersburg, A.E. Landau typography, 1904. 136 p. (In Russ.).

14. Mathanova N. P. Higher administration of Eastern Siberia in the middle of the 19th century: Problems of social stratification. Novosibirsk, Sibirskiy hronograf Publ., 2002. 250 p. (In Russ.).

15. Konovalov I. A. Local Self-Government among the Cossacks of Western Siberia and Northern Kazakhstan in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Istoriya Rossii = RUDN Journal of Russian History, 2020, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 578-590. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2020-19-3-578-590 (In Russ.).

16. Rumyantsev P.P. The struggle of the gendarmerie staff officers who supervised private industry in Siberia with the corruption of the volost peasant government. Vostochno-Evropeiskii nauchnyi vestnik = Eastern European Scientific Journal, 2017, no. 2, pp. S. 60–64. (In Russ.).

17. Moskvitin Ju.N. The police of the Tomsk province in 1867-1917 (organization, number and material support of employees). Cand. Diss. Thesis. Barnaul, 2004. 21 p. (In Russ.).

18. Konovalov I.A., Shimanis B.B. The structure of the municipal bodies of Western Siberia according to the Urban Statute of 1870. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2009, no. 2, pp. 23-29. (In Russ.).

19. Lokhvitskiy A. Guberniya. Its rural and government agencies. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, I. Bochkarev typography, 1864. 221 p. (In Russ.).

20. Palin A. V. Formation of Regional Interests of Central Authorities at the Stage of Discussion of the Siberian Provincial Reform in the Late XIX Century. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Istoriya = The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series “History”, 2018, vol. 26, pp. 34–43. DOI: 10.26516/2222-9124.2018.26.34. (In Russ.).

21. Liubichankovskiy S.V. Provincial Administration and the Problem of the Crisis of Power in Late Imperial Russia (based on the materials of the Urals, 1892-1914). Samara-Orenburg, Orenburg State University Publ., 2007. 750 p. (In Russ.).

22. Anuchin E.N. Historical review of the development of administrative and police institutions in Russia from the Statute of the Provinces of 1775 to the last time. St. Petersburg, Ministry of Interior typography, 1872. 238 p. (In Russ.).

23. Siegelbaum L.H. Paradise or Just a Little Bit Better? Siberian Settlement “Fever” in Late Imperial Russia. The Russian Review, 2017, vol. 76, iss. 1, pp. 22–37. DOI: 10.1111/russ.12117.

24. Lohr E., Sanborn J. Russia, 1917: Revolution as Demobilization and State Collapse. Slavic Review, 2017, vol. 76, iss. 3, pp. 703–709. – DOI: 10.1017/slr.2017.178.

25. Konovalov I. A. The crisis of local government in Siberia on the eve of the fall of the autocracy. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2018, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 771–782. (In Russ.).