Elements of progressive personal income taxation in the context of the principle of forward and backward links
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(1).68-79
Abstract
The idea of progressive tax scale in Russia received a fundamentally new development in 2020. The leading position of the personal income tax in most countries is due to a number of circumstances. First, it is a personal tax, the object of which is the income actually received by the payer, and not the estimated average income that could be received in specific economic conditions. Second, income tax allows to maximize the implementation of the basic principles of taxation – universality and uniformity. In recent decades, national regimes of personal income taxation regimes have been actively developed both in foreign countries and in Russia. Purpose of the study. The article considers the elements of progressive taxation of personal income in the context of the principle of direct and inverse relations. Dealing with selected provisions of the national legislation of European countries and Russia the article shows that elements of progressive taxation can be applied only in particular aspects. The proposals of taxation of rich taxpayers are also brought into light. Methodology. The research was carried out with the application of the formally legal interpretation of legal acts as well as the comparative analysis of Russian and European legal literature. Structural and systemic methods are also the basis of the research, The main results. The establishment of a classical progressive system in the Russian Federation will encourage a change in the model of behavior of both persons who have the opportunity to increase their income, but do not intend to do so due to a decrease in the nominal increase in wages, and persons who previously declared income in full, but if the tax model changes, they will apply personal income tax evasion schemes. In addition, the results of a comparative analysis of the experience of the EU Member States show the ineffectiveness of the progressive income tax scale as a tool to combat social inequality. The comparison provided in the research also examines the problems of proportional and progressive taxation in the context of the principle of equity. In the context of the practice of applying progressive taxation, the experience of foreign countries is studied. Based on foreign experience, it can be concluded that the introduction of family taxation would require a fundamental change in the basis of income taxation in the Russian Federation, as well as would entail discrimination of taxpayers in terms of registered and civil marriage and abuse in order to extract tax benefits. The authors conclude that a more appropriate option for taking into account family circumstances is the widespread use of tax deductions. Since Russian legislation does not establish poverty criteria, personal income tax is levied even on income in the amount of the subsistence minimum. This also does not correspond to the principle of social justice, because in the absence of such criteria, poverty cannot be considered a basis for tax exemption. Thus, the establishment of a classical progressive system in the Russian Federation will encourage a change in the model of behavior of both persons who have the opportunity to increase their income, but do not intend to do so due to a decrease in the nominal increase in wages, and persons who previously declared income in full, but if the tax model changes, they will apply personal income tax evasion schemes. We believe that in the context of the principle of equity, the essence of progressive taxation is not the establishment of several tax rates and is not determined by the number of tax deductions that can be granted only to a small number of persons, including wealthy taxpayers, but that it reflects the ability of a person to pay tax. In our opinion, this ability should be guaranteed by the exemption from taxation of the minimum amount of income (minimum wage). Сonclusions. According to the results of the study, it is concluded that the establishment of a classical progressive system in the Russian Federation will encourage a change in the behavior model of both persons who have the opportunity to increase their income, but do not intend to do so due to a decrease in the nominal increase in wages, and persons who previously declared income in full, but if the tax model changes, they will use personal income tax evasion schemes. In addition, the results of a comparative analysis of the experience of the EU member States show the ineffectiveness of the progressive income tax scale as a tool to combat social inequality. It is proposed to apply only elements of progressive taxation when reforming the Russian tax regime for individuals, namely, to establish a nontaxable minimum in the amount of the minimum wage, which will ensure tax fairness for taxpayers with lower-average incomes.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. M. ArtemovRussian Federation
Nikolay M. Artemov – Doctor of Law, Professor, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honoured Worker of Higher School of Russia; Professor, Department of Financial Law
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ul., Moscow, 125993
К. A. Ponomareva
Russian Federation
Karina A. Ponomareva – PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Associate Professor, Department of State and Municipal Law Dostoevsky
55a, Mira pr., Omsk, 644077
References
1. Shahmamet'ev A.A. International tax law. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenya Publ., 2014. 824 p. (In Russ.).
2. Avi-Yonah R.S. Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Fiscal Crisis of the Welfare State. Harvard Law Review, 2000, no. 7, pp. 1573-676.
3. Avi-Yonah R.S. Taxation for a New 'New Deal': Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Options //URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3603397 (accessed: 13.11.2020).
4. Ganghof S. The Politics of Income Taxation. A Comparative Analysis. Colchester, ECPR Press, 2006.
5. Kohler-Koch B. Governance and Institutional Development, in: Wiener A., Diez T. (eds.) European Integration Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004. Pp. 97-115.
6. Koerver Schmidt P. A General Income Inclusion Rule as a Tool for Improving the International Tax Regime – Challenges Arising from EU Primary Law. Intertax, 2020, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 983-997.
7. Ponomareva K.A. On some personal income taxation issues in the European Union. Nalogi = Taxes, 2017, no. 4, pp. 45-48. (In Russ.).
8. Artemov N.M., Lagutin I.B. The system of financial law: theoretical-methodological aspect. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2017, no. 3, pp. 67-72. (In Russ.).
9. Kostyukov A. N. Debatable issues of the subject and system of Russian financial law. Omsk, OmSU Publ., 2002. (In Russ.). 94 р.
10. Kazantsev N.M. Rethinking the method of financial law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2012, no. 6, pp. 47-59. (In Russ.).
11. Ashmarina E.M., Artemov N.M. Economic law of Russia and features of legal regulation of financial relations. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teorija i praktika = Law and state: theory and practice, 2020, no. 2, pp. 194-197. (In Russ.).
12. Gorbunova O.N. Financial law and financial monitoring in contemporary Russia. Moscow, Profobrazovanie Publ., 2003. (In Russ.). 158 p.
13. Pepelyaev S.G. (ed.). Personal and corporate income taxation. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2015. (In Russ.).
14. Demin A.V. Method of tax law: universal tools and industry features. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2009, no. 3, pp. 11-17. (In Russ.).
15. Ponomareva K.A. Specific features of taxation of income of individuals in relations with foreign elements. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2017, vol. 1, no. 2, pp 85-93. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).85-93.
16. Zhigachev A.V. Appeal of letters of the Federal tax service of Russia as normative acts (commentary to the Resolution of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of March 31, 2015 No. 6-P). ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.).
17. Malyutin N.S. Judicial interpretation as a constitutional procedure in the context of separation of powers in the Russian Federation. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe parvo = Constitutional and municipal law, 2015, no. 8, pp. 12-19. (In Russ.).
18. Ponomareva K.A. Business splitting: compliance with the principle of tax certainty in law enforcement practice. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 41-48. (In Russ.). DOI 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(2).41-48.
19. Chetverikov A.O. Method of the "second regime" in modern integration law: practice of the European Union, prospects of the Eurasian economic Union. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2016, no.1, pp. 61-64. (In Russ.).
20. Savitskiy A.I. Progressive taxation of income of individuals: prospects for introduction in Russia and foreign experience. Zakon, 2016, no. 10, pp. 44-62. (In Russ.).
21. Morozov D.V. Actual issues of progressive taxation of income. Nalogi (gazeta) = Taxes (Newspaper), 2007, no. 17, pp. 31-32. (In Russ.).
22. Panskov V.G. On the issue of the progressive scale of taxation of personal income. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and Taxation, 2009, no. 7, pp. 14-19. (In Russ.).
23. Zagvozdina V.N., Bastrikova A.M. on increasing the social role of the tax on personal income. Nalogi i finansovoe parvo = Taxes and Financial Law, 2015, no. 6, pp. 80-85. (In Russ.).
24. Belikov E.G. Social orientation of tax law: realities and prospects. Nalogi = Taxes, 2016, no. 2, pp. 10-14. (In Russ.).
25. Himicheva N.I., Belikov E.G. The principle of justice in the legal regulation of taxation of income of individuals. Nalogi = Taxes, 2016, no. 2, pp. 45-48. (In Russ.).
26. At the origins of financial law. M.M. Speranskij. N.I. Turgenev. M.F. Orlov / Jalbulganov A.A.; Kozyrin A.N. eds. M.: Statut, 1998. 432 p. (In Russ.).
27. L'vov D.M. The course of financial law. Kazan', University typography, 1887. (In Russ.). 521 р.
28. Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Moscow, Gossotsekgiz Publ., 475 p. (In Russ.).
29. Kucherov I.I. Justice of taxation and its components (legal aspect). Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2009, no. 4, pp. 24-29. (In Russ.).
30. Terehina A.P. System and principles of taxation of personal income in the most developed countries. Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2010, no. 11, pp. 36-39. (In Russ.).
31. Reut A.V. The influence of tax culture on the establishment of taxes (on the example of the tax on personal income). Finansovoe pravo = Financial Law, 2020, no. 8, pp. 29-33. (In Russ.).
32. Pepeljaev S.G. The tax for the base erosion. Nalogoved = Tax Expert, 2020, no. 10, pp. 4-7. (In Russ.).
33. Artemov N.M., Ponomareva K.A. Taxation of personal income in the context of issues of social fairness. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4. pp. 46–55. (In Russ.).
34. Milogolov N.S. The increased personal income tax rate for non-residents in the context of tax competition. Nalogoved = Tax Expert, 2017, no. 8, pp. 56-61. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Artemov N.M., Ponomareva К.A. Elements of progressive personal income taxation in the context of the principle of forward and backward links. Law Enforcement Review. 2021;5(1):68-79. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(1).68-79