LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT)
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).129-138
Abstract
This article comprehensively and adequately considered some theoretical and practical aspects concerning the types of expert activities, the implementation of which non-state forensic-expert institution should have an appropriate license issued by them in the manner prescribed by law. Reflected the current system of voluntary certification for the test subject non-state forensic activities. The analysis of judicial practice on sample questions provided law enforcement mistakes of actors eligible to appoint a forensic examination in the criminal case, invited some of the trends of the current legislation.
As shown in the examples, despite explicit legal requirements on licensing of certain types of expertise-there are still violations of non-state forensic agencies. Regarding the certification of the institutions, we note that the absence in the law on forensic examination requirements for mandatory certification activities of non-state forensic institutions allow these organizations to make a decision about the need of certification of their activities. This approach of the legislator to the activities of non-state forensic institutions in light of the discussion in this section is not correct, in view of what we have proposed recommendations to improve normative-legal regulation in the field of forensics.
About the Authors
I. Tarichko
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics;
SPIN-code: 1778-3080
A. Kondratyev
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Master student, Law Faculty;
SPIN-code: 3922-8830
References
1. Parfyonova M.V. Organization of public prosecutor's supervision of performance of the legislation on expert activities, methodical recommendations. Moscow, Academy of General Prosecutor’s Office of Russia Publ., 2015. 48 p. (in Russ.).
2. Elagina E.V. Expert certification and licence to carry out certain activities - as necessary factors determining admissibility of the expert’s judgement. Kriminalist, 2014, no. 1, pp. 47–52. (in Russ.).
3. Semyachkov A.K., Pankov I.V. Does forensic medical examination need to be licensed? Meditsina i farmatsiya KhMAO-Yugry, 2008, no. 1, pp. 18–23. (in Russ.).
4. Kurovskaya L.N., Timoshenko A.A. Systemic problems of organization of non-governmental judicial expert activities. Zakonnost, 2015, no. 9, pp. 55–59. (in Russ.).
5. Nikolaeva T.G., Elagina E.V., Shananina E.M. Some questions of production of judicial examination by non-state expert organizations or persons, not being the state experts. Kriminalist, 2011, no. 1, pp. 77–81. (in Russ.).
6. Rossinskaya E., Galyashina E. Non-state expert organizations, their legal status and organizational forms. Zakonnost, 2009, no. 2, pp. 28–32. (in Russ.).
7. Komissarova Ya.V. Problem aspects of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 21, 2010 No. 28 "About judicial examination on criminal cases". Rossiiskiy sudya, 2011, no. 3, pp. 28–30. (in Russ.).
8. Rossinskiy S.B. How to appoint a forensic examination. Ugolovnyi protsess, 2016, no. 6, pp. 20–26. (in Russ.).
9. Ambartsumov R.G. Step forward, two steps backwards or "Non-state experts" and "Non-state judicial and expert organizations". Available at: https://pravorub.ru/articles/30552html. (in Russ.).
10. Mamai V.I. Some problems of the theory and practice of judicial examination. About the status of the head of expert organization. Mirovoi sudya, 2008, no. 10, pp. 15–18. (in Russ.).
11. Vershitskaya G.V. Legal Features of Non-Governmental Expert Activity. Vestnik PAGS = The Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, 2014, no. 2, pp. 44–47. (in Russ.).
12. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I. Reference book of the judge: judicial examination. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2010. 464 p. (in Russ.).
13. Rossinskiy S.B. Problems of production of judicial examination in non-state judicial and expert organization (on the example of ANO SODEKS MGYuA of O.E. Kutafin), in: Ugolovnaya yustitsiya: svyaz vremen, International Scientific Conference, St. Petersburg, October 8-10, 2010. Available at: http://www.iuaj.net/node/457. (in Russ.).
14. Omelyanyuk G.G. Legal regulation of production of judicial examination by non-state court experts. Internet portal of NP Federation of Court Experts. Available at: http://sud-expertiza.ru/library/pravovoe-regulirovanie-pro-izvodstva-sudebnoy-ekspertizy-negosudarstvennymi-sudebnymi-ekspertami/. (in Russ.).
15. Averyanova T.V. Problems of judicial examination in the conditions of reform of a system of law, in: Prob-lems of action of the right in new historical conditions, Collection of works of Ministry of Internal Affairs Academy of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 1993. pp. 153–154. (in Russ.).
16. Tarkinskyi A.I., Yusupkadieva S.N. Non-state legal expert status and an order of calling. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 2013, no. 9, pp. 44–46. (in Russ.).
17. Rossinskaya E.R. Judicial examination: typical mistakes. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2014. 544 p. (in Russ.).
18. Panicheva A.I. Danger of the pseudoscientific conclusions. New lawyer newspaper, 2012, no. 1. (in Russ.).
19. Zemskova S.I. Examinations – an unresolved question of the Russian justice: Benefit for judges, and also the beginning lawyers, journalists and human rights activists. Moscow, FZG Publ., 2013. 112 p. (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tarichko I., Kondratyev A. LICENSING AND CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES OF NON-STATE FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS: THEORY, LEGISLATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE (CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ASPECT). Law Enforcement Review. 2017;1(1):129-138. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(1).129-138
Views:
1032
Email this article 