Experimental legal regimes of mobilization type as a method of legal regulation in the context of COVID-19 spread

Experimental legal regime; COVID19; legal regime; legal experiment; “regulatory sandboxes”; legal technique; classification of legal experiments; legality; experimental legal regimes of mobilization type on legal forecasting and legal interpretation methods. The theoretical basis of the research includes well-known legal science categories, i.e. legal regime and legal experiment that get a new interpretation with the appearance of experimental legal regime institute. The main results of the research, scope of application. Experimental legal regime is a broader legal phenomenon than regulatory sandboxes, which includes not only regulation of the digital innovation sphere, but also other rules that are limited in time and space. There are legal regimes with signs of experimentation that are not officially identified by the state as experimental legal regimes. The work studied the experience which arose due to  modern  changes  in  state  and  legal  regulation  caused  by  the  global  epidemic  of COVID-19. It is suggested to divide the legal experiments according to the purpose of experimental legislation into the following groups: optimizing, progressive and mobilization ones. The aim of the first group named “Optimizing legal experiments” is to test using of new regulation applied to a large and complex object. The second group named “Progressive legal experiments” is intended to check whether the abandonment of old laws is beneficial in the innovation field. The result is creation of a smart regulation for economic and 

technological development. The third group named “Mobilization legal experiments” is aimed at maintaining of the existing level of resources, security, and infrastructure in the event of critical situations. It is being proved that the legal restrictions aimed at preventing of COVID-19 viral infection spreading can be classified as experimental legal regimes of mobilization type. The criterion for distinguishing of mobilization experimental legal regimes from others is the voluntary participation in the legal experiment and the goal of the experimental legal regime.

Conclusions. The development of mobilization experimental legal regimes implies raising of their legality. It can be achieved by the provision of legal guarantees such as the goals of the legal experiment and the evaluation of their consequences. This will allow identify whether the consequences of the experiment correspond to the goals of the new legal regulation. There must be grounds for limitations to legal certainty caused by legal experimentation. Their manifestation is the goal and evaluation criteria, with the help of which it is possible to determine whether the consequences of the establishment of the experiment correspond to the goals of the new legal regulation. Otherwise, there is a risk of unjustified infringement of the rights and legitimate interests of citizens.

1. Alekseev S.S. General permissions and general prohibitions in Soviet law. Moscow, 1989. 288 p. (In Russ.).

2. Belyaeva G.S. The concept of the legal regime in the theory of law: the main approaches. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii, 2012, add. iss. 85, pp. 26–31. (In Russ.).

3. Cowan T.A. The design of legal experiment. Journal of Legal Education, 1954, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 520–538.

4. Zeisel H. Some Reflections on Legal Experimentation. Stanford Law Review, 1956, vol. 8, pp. 730–748.

5. Nikitinskii V.I., Samoshchenko I.S. (eds.) Legal experiment and improvement of legislation. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1988. 304 p. (In Russ.).

6. Eltsov V.N. Legal experiment in modern Russia: problems of efficiency, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Tambov, 2009. 21 p. (In Russ.).

7. Sivitsky V.A., Sorokin M.Yu. Legal experiment and development of law. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2016, no. 4, pp. 15–30. (In Russ.).

8. Dostov V.L., Shust P.M., Ryabkova E.S. Institute of "Regulatory Sandboxes" as a Tool to Support Financial Innovation. Den'gi i kredit, 2016, no. 10, pp. 51–56. (In Russ.).

9. Alekseenko A.A. Legal status and operating procedure of the regulatory sandbox of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. Alleya Nauki, 2018, no. 7 (23), pp. 508–512. (In Russ.).

10. Andronova T.A., Tarasenko O.A. The Regulatory Sandbox: Tradition vs. innovations. Bankovskoe pravo, 2018, no. 3, pp. 31–36. (In Russ.).

11. Kuklina E.A. On the issue of special legal regimes in the digital economy ("regulatory sandboxes"). Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, 2019, no. 7, pp. 39–49. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2019-7-39-49. (In Russ.).

12. Jenik I., Lauer K. Regulatory Sandboxes and Financial Inclusion, Working Paper. Washington, D.C., CGAP Publ., 2017. ii, 20 p. Available at: https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/Working-Paper-Regulatory-Sandboxes- Oct-2017.pdf.

13. Makarov V.O., Davydova M.L. On the Concept of Regulatory Sandboxes, in: Popkova E.G., Sergi B.S. (eds.) ISC 2020: "Smart Technologies" for Society, State and Economy, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 155, Springer Publ., 2021, pp. 1014–1020. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59126-7_112.

14. Naumov V.B. Law in the era of digital transformation: in search of solutions. Rossiiskoe pravo: obrazovanie, praktika, nauka, 2018, no. 6 (108), pp. 4–11. (In Russ.).

15. Fat'yanov I.V. Classifications of law-making experiments and their place in the legal system. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo, 2013, no. 3 (9), pp. 20–28. (In Russ.).

16. Mironov A. Experiment in the legal field. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba, 2009, no. 5 (61), pp. 115–116. (In Russ.).

17. Zagaynova G.G. Constitutional and legal experiment on the introduction of juvenile justice. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo; pravo i upravlenie, 2018, no. 8 (99), pp. 67–70. (In Russ.).

18. Davydova M.L., Makarov V.O. Experimental Legal Regimes (Regulatory Sandboxes): Theoretical Problems and Implementation Prospects in Modern Russia, in: Inshakova A.O., Inshakova E.I. (eds.) CRFMELD 2019: Competitive Russia: Foresight Model of Economic and Legal Development in the Digital Age, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference in Memory of Oleg Inshakov (1952-2018), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 110, Springer Publ., 2020, pp. 577–584. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_68.

19. Stepanenko D.M. The method of social and legal experiment in the system of research on the effectiveness of the state innovation function. Vesnіk Magіleўskaga dzyarzhaўnaga ўnіversіteta іmya A. A. Kulyashova. Seryya D, Ekanomіka, satsyyalogіya, prava, 2018, no. 1, pp. 37–45. (In Russ.).

20. Davydova M.L. "Smart regulation" in the context of legal communication between the state and society, in: Pravovaya kommunikatsiya gosudarstva i obshchestva: otechestvennyi i zarubezhnyi opyt, Collection on the materials of the International scientific conference (Voronezh, September 11–12, 2020), Voronezh, NAUKA-YuNIPRESS Publ., 2020, pp. 73–76. (In Russ.).

21. Eltsov V.N. Legal experiments in modern Russia: estimation of efficiency. Vestnik TGU, 2008, no. 11 (67), pp. 569–574. (In Russ.).

22. Zagaynova G.G. Municipal police (police public security) to attempt of constitutional law experiment. Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve, 2018, no. 4, pp. 124–126. (In Russ.)

23. Yuzhakov V.N. (ed.) Experimental Legal Regimes: Foreign Experience and Russian Start. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2020. 126 p. (In Russ.).

24. Anisimov A.P. Legal experiment in land law: theoretical questions. Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo, 2016, no. 10 (142), pp. 4–10. (In Russ.).

25. Zavyalova E.B., Krykanov D.D., Patrunina K.A. The mechanism of regulatory sandboxes for introducing digital innovations: the practice of implementing experimental legal regimes at national and supranational levels. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek = Journal of Law and Administration, 2019, no. 15(4), pp. 130–138. DOI: 10.24833/2073-84202019-4-53-130-138. (In Russ.).

26. Teplyashin P.V. Legal experiment in the sphere of execution of criminal penalties: theoretical basis. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo”, 2018, no. 4 (57), pp. 150–155. DOI 10.25513/1990-5173.2018.4.150-155. (In Russ.).