The role of legal responsibility in the implementation of the principle of the unity of public authority in Russia

The subject. The article presents a comprehensive general theoretical analysis of the institution of legal responsibility and its role, taking into account the consolidation of the new constitutional and legal principle of the unity of the system of public power.

The purpose of the research is to confirm or disprove hypothesis that it is necessary to legislate a full-fledged mechanism of legal responsibility of state bodies and local self-government bodies in order to implement the constitutional principle of the unity of public power.

Methodology. The formal legal method, the method of comparative legal analysis, dialectical method and systemic approach were used.

The main results, scope of application. The authors found the manifestation of dualism in the work of the institution of legal responsibility. It consists in the ability to bear responsibility both to the state, in connection with various offenses, and to the population itself. A brief description of the loss of trust as a basis for the responsibility of officials is given, taking into account contemporary legislation. Directions for the further development of this legal institution are highlighted. The article examines the opinion of the Russian Constitutional Court on the legitimacy of using the loss of trust as a basis for the responsibility of public authorities. The article examines the normative legal acts, which fix the mechanism for the implementation of the principle of maintaining trust in the activities of the authorities on the part of society. For example, in relation to state civil and municipal employees, a prohibition has been established on statements about the activities of authorities and their assessment, if such actions are not included in the list of their official duties. Such a mechanism for maintaining public confidence in the work of government bodies should contribute to strengthening the unity of the public power system. At the same time we can talk about the existing trend towards a decrease in the level of public confidence in the work of authorized bodies exercising public authority. The corruption and bureaucratization of the activities of officials, the expansion of the powers of law enforcement agencies, a decrease in the independence of the political opposition are pointed to among the possible reasons most often. In this regard, the paper proposes expanding the grounds for responsibility when implementing the procedure for recalling an official.

Conclusions. It is necessary to consolidate a full-fledged legislative mechanism of legal responsibility of state bodies and local self-government bodies, which will contribute to the implementation and strengthening of the new principle of the unity of public authority.

1. Lakhtina T.A. Local government as an element of public authority. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2015, no. 7, pp. 16–20. (In Russ.).

2. Chertkov A.N. Public power: composition, unity and essence of interaction. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2020, no. 10, pp. 19–23. (In Russ.).

3. Baranov P.P. Public power and its constitutional legitimacy in modern Russia: doctrine and practice. Administrator suda, 2017, no. 4, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.).

4. Evdokimov V.B. Local self-government in the system of public authority: constitutional ways of development. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2016, no. 11, pp. 18–23. (In Russ.).

5. Kozhokar I.P. Efficiency of Law in the Terminological Apparatus of the Theory of Law. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2020, iss. 48, pp. 196–225. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2020-48-196-225. (In Russ.).

6. Bobrova N.A. The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as a subject of constitutional responsibility. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 23–34. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(4).23-34. (In Russ.).

7. Kuz’min I. A. Comparative Legal Studies of Legal Liability: Specific Features. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2017, iss. 35, рp. 6–15. DOI: 10.17072/1995-41902017-35-6-15. (In Russ.).

8. Kravchenko A.G., Mamychev A.Yu. Features of legitimation of the results of legal and political activity of the Russian state power. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2013, no. 12, pp. 7–11. (In Russ.).

9. Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A. Subjective signs of positive legal responsibility. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2018, no. 29, pp. 29–39. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/29/3(In Russ.).

10. Soloviev A.A., Khurshudyan A.L. A complex of anti-corruption measures in state and municipal institutions. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian journal of criminology, 2020, no. 2, pp. 256–267. DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(2).256-267. (In Russ.).

11. Matuzov N.I. Legal system and personality. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 1987. 294 p. (In Russ.).

12. Kabyshev V.T., Zametina T.V., Kombarova E.V. Transparency of public authorities of the Republic of Crimea in the information society. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2020, no. 37, pp. 57–74. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/37/5. (In Russ.).

13. Kombarova E.V. Transparency of public authorities in the information society of Russia. Constitutional and municipal law. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2019, no. 12, pp. 15–18. (In Russ.).

14. Mayorov V. I., Sevryugin V. E. Crime Counteraction Based on the Modern Concepts of Interaction Between the Police and Society: the Experience of Foreign Countries and Russia. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie Nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2017, iss. 35, pp. 95–106. DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-3595-106. (In Russ.).

15. Tereshchenko L.K. Public power on the Internet. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2017, no. 4, pp. 144–157. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2017.4.144.157. (In Russ.).

16. Avakyan S.A. (ed.) Constitutional and legal foundations of anti-corruption reforms in Russia and abroad, Educational-methodical complex. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2016. 568 p. (In Russ.).

17. Korobov A.A. Transparency of public authorities as a means of preventing corruption, in: Protivodeistvie korruptsii: gosudarstvennaya politika I grazhdanskoe obschestvo, Collection of scientific articles, Saratov, 2015, pp. 203–205. (In Russ.).

18. Damm I.A., Tarbagaev A.N., Akunchenko E.A. The ban on receiving rewards (gifts) in connection with the performance of official duties as a measure of anti-corruption criminological security. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian journal of criminology, 2020, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 660–675. DOI: 10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(5).660-675 (In Russ.).

19. Truntsevsky Yu.V. On the content of the anti-corruption standard of behavior of state and municipal employees. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2019, no. 32, pp. 107–121. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/32/9. (In Russ.).

20. Malko A.V., Lipinsky D.A., Markunin R.S. Legal responsibility as a means of preventing offenses: topical problems. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2020, no. 4, pp. 4–24. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2020.4.4.24. (In Russ.).

21. Avakyan S.A. Constitutional theory and practice of public power: patterns and deviations. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2015, no. 10, pp. 5–11. (In Russ.).

22. Doktorova A.T. Responsibility of public authorities to the population. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2018, no. 4, pp. 36–38. (In Russ.).

23. Bezrukov A.V. Public formations and public authorities in ensuring the constitutional legal order: the main directions of activity and forms of cooperation. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2020, no. 1, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.).

24. Varlamova N.V. The effectiveness of legal regulation: rethinking the concept. Pravovedenie, 2009, no. 1, pp. 212–232. (In Russ.).

25. Bondar N.S. Legal certainty – a universal principle of constitutional rule of law (practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation). Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2011, no. 10, pp. 4–10. (In Russ.).

26. Khorunzhiy S.N. Trust in the authorities and the constitutional ban on the assessment of the actions of public bodies. Administrator suda, 2017, no. 4, pp. 8–12. (In Russ.).

27. Kochetkov S.S. "Loss of trust" as a legal category. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 6, рр. 257–260. (In Russ.).

28. Truntsevsky Yu.V. Disciplinary and judicial practice in cases of dismissal for a corruption offense due to loss of confidence. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 2020, no. 11, pp. 155–173. (In Russ.).

29. Ezhukova O.A. On the assessment of the effectiveness of public authorities in the new constitutional and legal and socio-economic conditions. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2020, no. 7, pp. 7–12. (In Russ.).

30. Sorokin V.V. Principles of legal responsibility: new criteria for classification and subordination. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo = Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2019, no. 33, рр. 15–25. DOI: 10.17223/22253513/33/2. (In Russ.).