Legal problems of use of compulsory psychiatric treatment in Russia and Belarus
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(4).187-196
Abstract
The subject of the research is the problems of legislative regulation of compulsory psychiatric measures in the criminal legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation.
The purpose of the article is to confirm or refute the hypothesis that there are defects in legislative regulation that prevent the effective use of compulsory psychiatric treatment. They are not eliminated in the Criminal Codes of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Research methodology. On the basis of a system-integrated approach on an interdisciplinary basis, a scientific analysis of special legal and forensic psychiatric scientific literature and interpretation of the criminal legislation of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation were carried out.
Main results. An analysis of the Criminal Codes of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation showed that compulsory psychiatric treatment is an independent institution of criminal law, which is regulated in sufficient detail in the national criminal legislation. The article includes a comparative legal analysis of the norms of the criminal legislation of both states (Chapter 14 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus and Chapter 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) that regulate psychiatric coercive measures applied to persons with mental disorders who have committed illegal acts. Based on the results of the study, a number of problems were identified in the legislative regulation of psychiatric compulsory measures in the criminal codes of both states, the authors propose directions for further improvement of the current criminal legislation.
Conclusions. The Criminal Codes of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation contain only general criteria for choosing the type of psychiatric measures of a coercive nature, in the most general form, the procedure for their change and termination is provided, they need editorial clarification of their purpose. There is no legislative definition of the concepts of “coercive security measures and treatment” (Chapter 14 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus) and “compulsory measures of a medical nature” (Chapter 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), etc., which causes serious difficulties in law enforcement practice and indicates the need to continue work to improve the current criminal legislation.
The terminology used “coercive and security measures and treatment” (Chapter 14 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus) and “coercive measures of a medical nature” (Chapter 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) does not reflect the specifics of these measures, which in their essence and content are exclusively psychiatric measures. The identified problems of legislative regulation of psychiatric compulsory measures in the criminal legislation of both states require their further resolution, and based on the interdisciplinary medico-legal nature of the problems involved, with the obligatory involvement of forensic psychiatrists in their solution.
About the Authors
A. L. Santashov
Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey L. Santashov – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher (on Sociological Research), Research Department, Faculty of Training of Scientific and Pedagogical Personnel and Organization of Research Work
12, Vrubelya ul., Moscow, 125080
M. Yu. Kashinskiy
Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus
Belarus
Belarus
Mihail Yu. Kashinskiy – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Police Colonel, Postdoc, Scientific and Pedagogical Faculty
6, Masherova pr., Minsk, 220005
L. N. Tarabuev
Vologda Institute of Law and Economics of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leonid N. Tarabuev – PhD in Law, senior lecturer, chair of combat and tactical-special training, faculty of engineering and economics,
2, Shetinina ul., Vologda, 160002
References
1. Shesler A.V., Veselovskaya A.V. Public danger of a person as a basis for applying compulsory medical measures. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, 2021, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 426–433. (In Russ.).
2. Merkur’ev V.V., Zvonov A.V., Yakovlev A.A. Criminal law measures providing for the treatment of socially significant diseases: a mandatory application or a selective addition. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, 2021, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 332–340. (In Russ.).
3. Markova M.A. Compulsory medical measures in the criminal law of some foreign states. Pravo.by, 2017, no. 1 (45), pp. 77–82. (In Russ.).
4. Teplyashin P.V. Concept of the development of the Russian penitentiary system in light of interpreted principles of European penitentiary practice. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 2020, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 129–139. (In Russ.).
5. Chuprova O.N., Belous V.G. Differentiation of responsibility in criminal law of Continental Europe and Russia. Arkhangelsk, Institute of Management Publ., 2015. 197 p. (In Russ.).
6. Akhramenka N.F. Scientific and practical commentary to the Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus, ed. by A.V. Barkov, V.M. Khomich. Minsk, GIUST BGU Publ., 2007. 1007 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bimbinov A.A., Shtage D. The development of medical criminal law in Germany and in Russia. Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Criminology, 2021, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 456–465. (In Russ.).
8. Malinovskii A.A. Comparative criminal law, Monograph. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ., 2002. 376 p. (In Russ.).
9. Krylova N.N., Serebryannikova A.V. Criminal law in foreign countries (England, USA, France, Germany). Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 1997. 192 p. (In Russ.).
10. Aistova L.S., Kraev D.Yu. Criminal law of foreign countries. St. Petersburg, Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation Publ., 2013. 132 p. (In Russ.).
11. Aryamov A.A., Bodaevskii V.P., Kisin A.V. Criminal law of foreign states. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2018. 324 p. (In Russ.).
12. Klyukanova T.M. Criminal law of foreign countries. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publ., 2015. 95 p. (In Russ.).
13. Zhalinskii A.E. Modern German criminal law. Moscow, TK Velbi Publ., Prospekt Publ., 2006. 560 p. (In Russ.).
14. Changhai Long. The problem of criminal sanctions in China: current situation and prospect. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 2020, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 173–179. (In Russ.).
15. Laptev D.B. On the legal nature of compulsory medical measures. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 2019, no. 12, pp. 24–27. (In Russ.).
16. Kashinskii M.Yu. On the need to improve the institution of compulsory security measures and treatment in criminal legislation. Vestnik Akademii MVD Respubliki Belarus’ = Bulletin of the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, 2020, no. 2, pp. 126–131. (In Russ.).
17. Kashinskii M. Yu. Problems of improving the implementation of compulsory security and treatment measures for persons with diminished responsibility, in: Sovershenstvovanie deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del s uchetom sovremennykh realii, the materials of the international scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 25th anniversary of Independence of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the 20th anniversary of the establishment of the educational institution (November 18, 2016), Aktobe, Aktobe law institute of the Republic of Kazakhstan named after M. Bukenbaev, 2016, pp. 104−107. (In Russ.).
18. Santashov A.L., Efremova N.M. The use of compulsory medical measures against convicts: problems of differentiation and individualization. Vestnik instituta: prestuplenie, nakazanie, ispravlenie, 2019, no. 1 (13), pp. 85–89. (In Russ.).
19. Shishkov S.N., Polubinskaya S.N. Legislative problems of mandatory medical measures (chapter 15 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Lex Russica, 2019, no. 6, pp. 161–172. (In Russ.).
20. Spasennikov B.A., Spasennikov S.B. Insanity in criminal law, Monograph. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2013. 256 p. (In Russ.).
21. Zhukovets K.G., Ostyanko Yu.I., Evtukhovich E.D. Methodological recommendations on compulsory security and treatment measures recommended for persons suffering from mental disorder (illness), aimed at preventing new socially dangerous acts, protection and treatment of such persons (basics of forensic psychiatric assessment, methodology of expert assignment). Minsk, Main Department of Forensic Medical Examinations of the Central Office of the State Forensic Examinations Committee of the Republic of Belarus, 2015. 25 p. (In Russ.).
22. Shandra B.B., Ostapets I.Y. The change of person’s worldview in the process of the criminal world subculture formation. Sciences of Europe, 2019, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 64–68.
23. Tygart C.E. Criminal subculture influence among middle-class and nonaffluent youth. Urban Education, 1981, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 481–484.
24. Richards S.C. USP marion: the first federal supermax. The Prison Journal, 2008, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 6–22.
25. Echeburúa E., Fernández-Montalvo Ja., Amor P.J. Psychopathological profile of men convicted of gender violence. A study in the prisons of Spain. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2003, vol. 18, no. 7, pр. 798–812.
26. Spasennikov B.A., Smirnov A.M., Tikhomirov A.N. Criminal behavior and mental disorders, Monograph. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2016. 198 p. (In Russ.).
27. Spasennikov B.A., Smirnov A.M. The nature of prisoner’s sexual excesses and the main directions of their prevention in penal institutions of a new type. Ugolovno-ispolnitel'noe pravo = Penal Law, 2011, no. 2 (12), pp. 33–36. (In Russ.).
28. Johnson H.D., LaVoie J.C., Spenceri M.C. Peer conflict avoidance: associations with loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance. Psychological Reports, 2001, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 227–235.
29. Maslach С., Jackson S.Е., Leiter M.P., Schaufeli W.B., Schwab R.L. Maslach Burnout Inventory (МВ1). Palo, Consulting Psychologists press, 1986. 112 p.
30. Smirnov A.M. Long terms of imprisonment in relation to convicted men (criminal law and penal enforcement aspects), Cand. Diss. Vologda, 2009. 247 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Santashov A.L., Kashinskiy M.Yu., Tarabuev L.N. Legal problems of use of compulsory psychiatric treatment in Russia and Belarus. Law Enforcement Review. 2021;5(4):187-196. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2021.5(4).187-196
Views:
575
Email this article 