Preview

Правоприменение

Расширенный поиск

Модель гибкого налогового администрирования и налоговый комплайенс

https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).80-92

Аннотация

Отмечается, что глобальный тренд современной налоговой политики заключается в понимании того, что налоговое администрирование по своей сути должно выражаться не в противостоянии налогоплательщиков и налоговых органов, но в их диалоге, взаимодействии и сотрудничестве. Фискальным органам рекомендуется придерживаться «сотруднических подходов» во взаимоотношениях с налогоплательщиками, основываясь на диалоге, взаимопонимании, беспристрастности, транспарентности и гибком реагировании. При этом законопослушное поведение должно всячески поощряться, неправомерное – подвергаться усиленному дестимулированию. И убеждение, и принуждение как методы налогового администрирования имеют свои плюсы и минусы. Поэтому ключ к успешной стратегии налогового администрирования – не отказ от одного метода в пользу другого, но их сбалансированное комбинирование, чтобы оба метода кумулятивно дополняли друг друга.

Об авторе

А. В. Демин
Сибирский федеральный университет
Россия

Демин Александр Васильевич – доктор юридических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры коммерческого, конкурентного и финансового права.

660130, Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 79



Список литературы

1. Alm J., Beebe J., Kirsch M.S., Marian M.S., Soled J. New Technologies and the Evolution of Tax Compliance. Virginia Tax Review, 2020, vol. 39, no. 3, рр. 287–356.

2. Karkkainen B.C. «New Governance» in Legal Thought and in the World: Some Splitting as Antidote to Overzealous Lumping. Minnesota Law Review, 2004, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 471–497.

3. Job J., Honaker D. Short-term Experience with Responsive Regulation in the Australian Taxation Office, in: (ed.). Braithwaite V. Taxing Democracy, Farnham, Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2002, pp. 111–130.

4. Orly L. The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought. Minnesota Law Review, 2004, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 262–390.

5. Sparrow M.K. The Regulatory Craft: Controlling Risks, Solving Problems, and Managing Compliance. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press, 2000. 370 р.

6. Dodd N., Hutter B.M. Geopolitics and the Regulation of Economic Life. Law and Policy, 2000, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–24.

7. Ayres I., Braithwaite J. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992. 216 р.

8. Nielsen V.L., Parker C. Testing Responsive Regulation in Regulatory Enforcement. Regulation & Governance, 2009, vol. 3, no. 4, рр. 376–399.

9. Ford C. Prospects for Scalability: Relationships and Uncertainty in Responsive Regulation. Regulation & Governance, 2013, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 14–29.

10. Lehmann-Nielsen V., Parker Ch. Testing Responsive Regulation in Regulatory Enforcement. Regulation & Governance, 2009, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 376–399.

11. Osofsky L. Some Realism About Responsive Tax Administration. Tax Law Review, 2012, vol. 66, no. 2, рр. 301–358.

12. Braithwaite V. Responsive Regulation and Taxation: Introduction. Law & Policy, 2007, vol. 29, no. 1, рр. 3–10.

13. Freedman J. Responsive Regulation, Risk and Rules: Applying the Theory to Tax Practice. UBC Law Review, 2012, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 627–662.

14. Book L. Refund Anticipation Loans and the Tax Gap. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 2009, vol. 20, no. 1, рр. 85–117.

15. McAdams R.N., Nadler J. Coordinating in the Shadow of the Law: Two Contextualized Tests of the Focal Point Theory of Legal Compliance. Law & Society Review, 2008, vol. 42, no. 4, рр. 865–898.

16. Leviner S. A New Era of Tax Enforcement: From «Big Stick» to Responsive Regulation. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2009, vol. 42, no. 2, рр. 381–429.

17. Burton M. Responsive Regulation and the Uncertainty of Tax Law – Time to Reconsider the Commissioner’s Model of Cooperative Compliance? eJournal of Tax Research, 2007, vol. 5, no. 1, рр. 71–104.

18. Kirchler E., Hoelzl E., Wahl I. Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The «Slippery Slope» Framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2008, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 210–225.

19. Alm J., Torgler B. Do Ethics Matter? Tax Compliance and Morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 2011, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 635–651.

20. Alm J. What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 2019, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 353–388.

21. Okanga O.O. Trust and Efficiency in Tax Administration: The Silent Role of Policy-Based Legitimate Expectation in Nigeria. Journal of Tax Administration, 2021, vol. 6, no. 1, рр. 122–147.

22. Végh G., Gribnau H. Tax Administration Good Governance. EC Tax Review, 2018, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 48–60.

23. Holmes R.Y. Forcing Cooperation: A Strategy for Improving Tax Compliance. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 2011, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1415–1459.

24. Bird R.M. Improving Tax Administration in Developing Countries. Journal of Tax Administration, 2015, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–45.

25. Torgler B. Tax Morale and Compliance: Review of Evidence and Case Studies for Europe, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5922. December 1, 2011. 84 p. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1977173 (accessed: 04.09.2021).

26. Lederman L. Does Enforcement Reduce Voluntary Tax Compliance? Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018, vol. 2018 (2018–2019), iss. 3, рр. 623–694.

27. Slemrod J. Cheating Ourselves: The Economics of Tax Evasion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2007, vol. 21, no. 1, рр. 25–48.

28. Kleven H., Knudsen M., Kreiner, Claus Th., Pedersen S.L., Saez E. Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Randomized Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark. Econometrica, 2011, vol. 79, no. 3, рр. 651–692.

29. Lederman L. The Fraud Triangle and Tax Evasion. Iowa Law Review, 2021, vol. 106, iss. 3, рр. 1153–1207.

30. Lavoie R. Flying above the Law and Under the Radar: Instilling a Taxpaying Ethos in those Playing by Their Own Rules. Pace Law Review, 2009, vol. 29, no. 4, рр. 637–687.

31. Lavoie R. Patriotism and Taxation: The Tax Compliance Implications of the Tea Party Movement. Loyola Law Review, 2011, vol. 45, no. 1, рр. 39–86.

32. Manhire J. Tax Compliance as a Wicked System. Florida Tax Review, 2016, vol. 18, no. 6, рр. 235–274.

33. Murphy К. Regulating More Effectively: The Relationship Between Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Tax Non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society, 2005, vol. 32, no. 4, рр. 562–589.

34. D’Ascenzo M. Global Trends in Tax Administration. Journal of Tax Administration, 2017, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–100.


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Демин А.В. Модель гибкого налогового администрирования и налоговый комплайенс. Правоприменение. 2022;6(2):80-92. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).80-92

For citation:


Demin A.V. Responsive tax administration model and tax compliance. Law Enforcement Review. 2022;6(2):80-92. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(2).80-92

Просмотров: 821


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)