Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

The integration of law and integrality of the legislation as necessary conditions for the success of law enforcement in interstate integration

https://doi.org/10.24147/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).5-11

Abstract

УДК 341.1+342.2

Subject. The article substantiates the need for a special system of legislation for any project of international integration. Only such system, being integral, may, firstly, become the basis for the formation of an integrative law of this integration project, and secondly, have a supranational constitutionality, giving the ability to individual enforcement.
Purpose. The purpose of this paper is the design of the constitutional-legal mechanisms of international integration in the scope of an integrative understanding of law and law enforcement.
Methodology. The author uses methods of theoretical analysis, particularly the theory of integrative legal consciousness, as well as legal methods, including formal legal method and comparative law.
Results, scope of application. The author points out that the formation of a single legal space in the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), as well as in Customs Union and the Eurasian Economic Community before, is a development of constitutional law of supranational level, not of international law. The integration of law and integrality of the legislation are prerequisite for the success of the interstate Eurasian integration.

Integration of law means the completeness of its internal structure, implies the indissoluble inner coherence of the law, its wholeness, unity. Coherent legal norms, embodied in legislation, can only create the phenomenon of law. The law should be understood as a metasystem, supersystem, it accumulates all socially significant systems and integrates the values of the law itself, its principles, values, other social regulators and regulated spheres of social relations. Attempts to apply the concept of "integration", but to abandon the notion of "integrality" are unreasonable, this terminological dichotomy is just a word game.
If we talk about law, it is more appropriate to talk about it’s iintegrity, but if we talk about legislation, emerging to accelerate and deepen integration processes, it is more appropriate to talk about integrality.
The author critically analyzes the features of an integrative understanding of law that are highlighted in the legal literature.
The results of the study can be applied in the design of the constitutional-legal mechanisms of interstate Eurasian integration in the framework of the legal modernization of the modern Russian state.
Conclusions. The author comes to the conclusion that the use of integral norms of the legislation makes the law alive and develop the integration models. Instability of legal regulation is a serious challenge to the integrity of Russian law. Emerging legislation of the Union State of Russia and Belarus and the Eurasian Economic Union are integral, but the law of these political and legal entities is not integrative today, it does not exist simply. As a consequence, law enforcement in the States participating in the interstate integration is carried out only through the implementation of national legislation.

About the Author

S. Baburin
Institute of Socio-Political Research RAS; Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Law, Professor, Hon-oured Lawyer of the Russian Federation, head re-searcher (Institute of Socio-Political Research RAS), Professor (Dostoevsky Omsk State University), Department of Theory and History of State and Law

SPIN-code: 1212-8135; AuthorID: 790520



References

1. Zorkin V.D. Russian Constitution 1993 as the legal legitimation of modern Russia, in: Zorkin V.D. (ed.). Kommentarii k Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2011, pp. 9–26. (In Russ.).

2. Vasilevich G.A. Some aspects of the development of the legal system of the Republic of Belarus in modern conditions, in: Sbornik, posvyashchennyi pamyati Vladimira Fadeeva, in 2 volumes, Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2015,Vol. II, pp. 599–608. (In Russ.).

3. Kazannik A.I., Kostyukov A.N. (eds.). Constitutional law. University course, in 2 volumes, Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016. Vol. 1. 432 p. (In Russ.).

4. Entin L.M. (ed.). Sud Evropeiskikh soobshchestv. Izbrannye resheniya. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2001. 400 p.(In Russ.).

5. Lazarev V. Integrative perception of law. Kazan University Law Review, 2016, Vol. 1, no.1, pp. 19–32.

6. Sorokin V.V. Legal psychology: questions of General theory of law, Monograph. Barnaul, Azbuka Publ., 2015.354 p. (In Russ.).

7. General theory of law, a manual. Minsk, BSU Publ., Chetyre chetverti Publ., 2014. 416 p. (In Russ.).

8. Pobedonostsev K.P. Legal works. Moscow, Zertsalo Publ., 2012. 416 p. (In Russ.).

9. Stuchka P. Law, in: Stuchka P. (ed.). Encyclopedia of state and law, in 3 volumes, Moscow, Communist Acad-emy Publ., 1925-1927, Vol. 3, co. 424. (In Russ.).

10. Marchenko M.N. (ed.). Modern law, course of lectures. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.).

11. Cherdantsev A.F. Integrative Misunderstanding Law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2016, no. 10, pp. 5–15. (In Russ.).

12. Gurvich G.D. Philosophy and sociology of law, Selected works. St. Petersburg, SPbSU Publ., 2004. 848 p. (In Russ.).

13. Nedbaylo P.E. The Application of Soviet legal norms. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1960. 150 p. (In Russ.).

14. Yakovlev V.F. Legal state: problems of formation. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2012. 488 p. (In Russ.).

15. Zhalinsky A., Reriht A. Introduction to German law. Moscow, Spark Publ., 2001. 767 p. (In Russ.).

16. Chistyakov O.I. Constitution of the USSR of 1924. Moscow, Zertsalo-M Publ., 2015. 224 p. (In Russ.).

17. Lukasheva E.A. Man, law, civilizations: normative value dimension. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2016. 384 p. (In Russ.).

18. Osavelyuk A.M. On the interaction of morality and law, in: Sbornik, posvyashchennyi pamyati Vladimira Fadeeva, in 2 volumes, Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2015, Vol. II, pp. 433–445. (In Russ.).

19. Muromtsev S.A. Selected works. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2015. 496 p. (In Russ.).

20. Kerimov A.D., Kuksin I.N. A strong state as a determining factor of social progress. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2017. 96 p. (In Russ.).

21. Vasilevich G.A. The Drafts of Constitution of the Republic of Belarus: the search for optimal models (1990-1994). Minsk, Pravo i ekonomika Publ., 2014. 308 p. (In Russ.).

22. Zakhartsev S.I., Salnikov V.P. Philosophy. The philosophy of law. Legal science. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2015. 264 p. (In Russ.).

23. Tkachenko N. Statistical analysis of the Federal legislation. Moscow, Center for strategic research Publ., 2017. Available at “Garant”. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Baburin S. The integration of law and integrality of the legislation as necessary conditions for the success of law enforcement in interstate integration. Law Enforcement Review. 2017;1(2):5-11. https://doi.org/10.24147/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).5-11

Views: 824


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)