OECD and deoffshorization of microstates of Europe

The article is devoted to studying the issue of the formation of the international legal regulation of the activities of so-called offshore zones – special jurisdictions that specialize in providing financial services to non-residents in conditions of low or zero taxation, stability and confidentiality. Since the late 1990s, the most successful anti-offshore policy has been conducted (in close cooperation with the G20 states) by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which has begun to actively use both organizational and international legal methods in its activities. The most successful examples include the OECD adopting the International Standards for the Exchange of Tax Information (Tax Information Exchange Agreements) in 2009, the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Program in 2013 (which has become its most significant and successful initiative), the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement in 2014, as well as the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting in 2016, and others.

However, in Europe the OECD was forced to face a situation where not only member states or specific territories that are in one form or another directly dependent on said states served as offshore zones, but also small (micro) sovereign states that were not its members. The microstates of Europe ended up resisting the OECD's anti-offshore activities for quite a while, since the high profitability of the offshore business made these states accustomed to getting “easy” money, and their population – to the high standard of living, which was largely provided for by these funds. The conducted research allowed the author to draw the conclusion that multiple stages can be singled out in this confrontation, during which the microstates of Europe, somewhat successful at first, were eventually forced to cooperate with the OECD and officially accept the rules the latter, as well as the mechanisms of interstate tax control it introduced. To a large extent, this stemmed from the fact that the microstates feared the G20 countries would levy sanctions against them, as well as because some of the microstates of Europe, in light of the instability of the world financial and economic system, were looking for ways to access the European market by obtaining the status of associated EU members. Nonetheless, while formally adhering to the OECD requirements, the microstates of Europe are still attempting to provide offshore services to nonresidents by transforming and significantly complicating the financial schemes used for such purposes. General scientific methods, the technic method, the concrete-historical and the historicalgenetic methods, as well as the formal-dogmatic and the systemic approaches were used within the framework of the study.

Offshores and the settlement of cross-border tax relations is one of the most vital economic problems of our time, yet no fundamental scientific research on the international relations of the OECD and the microstates of Europe has yet been carried out.

1. Timofeeva O.F., Krest’yaninova M.I. Offshore jurisdictions as an instrument of international tax planning: the world experience of their creation. Mir nauki = The world of science, 2014, no. 1, pp. 1–6. (In Russ.).

2. Sargsyan L.M. The structure of the international system of regulation of offshore zones: current state and prospects of development. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika = Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 25: International Relations and World Politics, 2016, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 31–54. (In Russ.).

3. Shepenko R.A. International legal regulation of countering tax avoidance and evasion. Nalogi i finansy = Taxes and finance, 2011, no. 3, pp. 43–48. (In Russ.).

4. Zaxarov A.N., Starovaya Yu. Capital «flight» as one of the consequences of. Mirovoe i natsional’noe khozyaistvo = World and national economy, 2017, no. 1 (140), pp. 1–6, available at: http://www.mirec.ru/up-load/ckeditor/files/mirec-2017-1-zakharov.pdf (accessed: February 22, 2022). (In Russ.).

5. Artemova M.A., Dmitrieva A.B. The problem of offshore zones in global finance. Finansovaya zhizn’ = Financial life, 2017, no. 2, pp. 66–71. (In Russ.).

6. Bodrov A.G. On the role and factors of offshore zones in the global financial system of the post-war period. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya = Economic relations, 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49–62. DOI: 10.18334/eo.8.1.38887. (In Russ.).

7. Zucman G. The hidden wealth of nations: The Policy scourge of tax havens. Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2015. 121 p.

8. Oppengejm L. International law, vol. 1, pt. 1, ed. by H. Lauterpacht. Moscow, Inostrannaya literatura Publ., 1948. 407 p. (In Russ.).

9. Nefedova M.B. The Microstates of Europe on the World political chessboard: History and Modernity. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kul’tura = Society: philosophy, history, culture, 2019, no. 11 (67), pp. 102–110. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2019.11.17. (In Russ.).

10. Mixajlin A.N., Smirnov E.N. The evolution and the current stage of the functioning of offshore zones in foreign and Russian practice. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki = Bulletin of Eurasian Science, 2018, no. 5, available at: https://esj.today/PDF/67ECV-N518.pdf (accessed: February 22, 2022). (In Russ.).

11. Yakovlev A.A. Features of anti-offshore measures in the framework of the modern system of supranational and domestic regulation. Vestnik ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti = Bulletin of Economic Security, 2019, no. 3, pp. 331–334. DOI: 10.24411/2414-3995-2019-10188. (In Russ.).

12. Kotlyarov M.A., Rykova I.N. Countering the transfer of the tax base to low-tax jurisdictions: the OECD experience and priorities for Russia. Finansovyi zhurnal. Nauchno-issledovatel’skii finansovyi institut = Financial journal. Financial Research Institute, 2014, no. 4 (22), pp. 47–54. (In Russ.).

13. Shelepov A.V. BEPS Project: Global cooperation in the field of taxation. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii = Bulletin of International Organizations, 2016, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 36–59. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2016-07-36. (In Russ.).

14. Smirnov E.N. Offshore schemes in the modern international capital movement: features and mechanisms of counteraction. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki = Bulletin of Eurasian Science, 2018, no. 5, available at: https://esj.to-day/PDF/66ECVN518.pdf (accessed: February 22, 2022). (In Russ.).

15. Avshalumov M.A. The OECD Global Initiative to Counteract Tax Minimization and Tax Withdrawal. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki = Problems of economics and legal practice, 2021, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 295–301. (In Russ.).

16. Vlcek W. Offshore Finance and Small States: Sovereignty, Size and Money. London, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2008. 198 р. DOI: 10/1057/9780230234925.

17. Margulis A.P. Changing accents in International Tax Law of the 21st century: BEPS. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost’ = Legal science: history and modernity, 2018, no. 10, pp. 137–143. (In Russ.).

18. Balashova Yu.G., Eloxova I.V. Problems of the tax system in the period of globalization: the BEPS project. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika i obshchestvo = Innovative economy and society, 2019, no. 2 (24), pp. 2–6. (In Russ.).

19. Xajk M. BEPS Project: A global Approach to combating Tax Abuse. Biznes i dizain revyu = Business and design review, 2017, no. 4 (8), pp. 1–6. (In Russ.).

20. Suzdal’skii G.A., Semenova G.N. Digitalization of the world economy and taxation problems. Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo = Economics and entrepreneurship, 2019, no. 7 (108), pp. 236–240. (In Russ.).

21. Nikolaeva Zh.A. The practice of countering tax evasion in the period of globalization. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoi praktiki = Problems of economics and legal practice, 2020, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 265–271. (In Russ.).

22. Berberov A.B., Milogolov N.S. Tax policy when joining the multilateral instrument for the implementation of BEPS: analysis of approaches in Russia and foreign countries. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie = Taxes and taxation, 2017, no. 10, pp. 27–44. DOI: 10.7256/2454-065X.2017.10.24463. (In Russ.).

23. Pinskaya M.R. (ed.). International taxation. Erosion of the tax base using offshore companies. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2018. 192 p. (In Russ.).

24. Sapezhinskaya A.A. OECD BEPS Project: Overview, current situation and development prospects. Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriya: Ekonomika i pravo = Modern science: actual problems of theory and practice. Series: Economics and Law, 2021, no. 7, pp. 179–185. DOI: 10.37882/2223-2974.2021.07.33. (In Russ.).

25. Burgers I., Mosquera I. Corporate Taxation and BEPS: A Fair Slice for Developing Countries? Erasmus Law Review, 2017, no. 1, pp. 29–47.

26. Cockfield A.J. Shaping International Tax Law and Policy in Challenging Times. Stanford Journal of International Law, 2018, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 223–240.

27. Azam R. Ruling the World: Generating International Tax Norms in the Era of Globalization and BEPS. Suffolk University Law Review, 2017, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 517–586.

28. Poponova N.A., Minina T.I. About the peculiarities of international tax relations at the present stage. Vestnik universiteta. Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya = Bulletin of the University. State University of Management, 2020, no. 11, pp. 126–132. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2020-11-126-132. (In Russ.).

29. Seabrooke L., Wigan D. The governance of global wealth chains. Review of International Political Economy, 2017, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–29.

30. Sharman J.C. Illicit Global Wealth Chains after the financial crisis: micro-states and an unusual suspect. Review of International Political Economy, 2017, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 30–55. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2015.1130736.

31. Haberly D., Wójcik D. Regional Blocks and Imperial Legacies: Mapping the Global Offshore FDI Network. Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, 2015, vol. 91, iss. 3, pp. 251–280.