The Royal Courts of Equity in England in the 16-17 centuries.
https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).38-45
Abstract
УДК 340.15
The subject of research are the courts of England in 16-17 centuries.
The purpose of article is to answer the question which courts must be included to a number of "courts of equity".
Methodology. Historical analysis of the scientific literature, of the English legislation and judicial practice of the 16-17 centuries.
Results. The priority for the Court of Star Chamber was to protect the interests of Royal power and not the rights of people. Moreover, this court did not seek to bridge the gaps of common law. In this regard, his reference to the number of “courts of equity” is incorrect.
Star Chamber had a close relationship with the Privy Council. There were no clear boundaries between them during the XVI century. The Star Chamber was the emergency Committee of the Privy Council
The purpose of the Court of Requests was to ease social tensions, to create the impression of caring filed emanating from the monarch and the nobility.
Despite the fact that the Court of the Requests was conceived as "a court for poor people", it became popular wealthy people under the rule Henry VIII.
The Court of High Commission was a court focused on the strengthening of Royal power. In its activities it has been focused on improving the rights of the Kingdom.
The Court of Exchequer provided judicial protection for some types of transactions that are not recognized by the common law. In this it is similar to the Chancery Court. Initially, the Court of the Exchequer has been focused on protecting the interests of the crown. Therefore, the function to eliminate the gaps of the common law could not be implemented in full.
The Chancery Court, unlike the special courts were required to consider complaints coming from citizens about the inability to get a fair trial.
Conclusions. The criteria for judicial institutions to be considered as “courts of equity” are: the purpose of the establishment of the court was to fill gaps in the common law; interference with the jurisdiction of other courts, in fact, has been focused on the eradication the deficiencies of the common law; the court of equity was not supposed to apply a legal fiction in their practice; specialization in civil cases. The number of “courts of equity” may be assigned only by the Chancery Court.
About the Author
I. StrizhakovRussian Federation
Postgraduate student, teaching assistant, Department of Theory and History of State and Law
References
1. Plucknett T.F. A Concise History of the Common Law, 5th ed. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund Inc., 2010. 828 p.
2. Aparova T. V. Precedent in English law: a legal and historical study, Cand. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 1968. 26 p. (In Russ.).
3. Holdsworth W. A history of English law, in 12 volumes. Boston, Little, Brown, and company, 1922-1926.
4. Selected Historical Essays of F.W. Maitland, Chosen and introduced by H.M. Cam. London, Cambridge University Press, 1957. 278 p.
5. Potter H. An historical introduction to English law and its institutions. London, Sweet&Maxwell, 1932. 360 p.
6. Walker R. English Legal System. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 1980. 631 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bacon F. The History of the Reign of King Henry the Seventh, Ed. R. Lockyer. London, 1971. 256 p.
8. Savin A.N. English village in the Tudor period, 2nd ed., Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2012. 485 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kostritsyna N.A. Limitation of warranties of personality in English law. Habeas corpus Act 1679 and emergency legislation in England. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1957. 179 p. (In Russ.).
10. Mineeva T.G. The development of public-legal institutions of England in the 14-15 centuries, Doct. Diss. Nizhny Novgorod, 2011. 447 p. (In Russ.).
11. Select cases in the Court of Requests A.D. 1497–1569. Vol. XXII. London, Selden Society, 1898. 257 p.
12. Gardiner S.R. History of England from the Accession of James I to the Disgrace of Chief-justice Coke. 1602-1616, in 2 volumes. London, Hurst and Blackett, 1863. Vol. II. 441 p.
13. Archer P. The English Legal System. Moscow, 1959. 268 p. (In Russ.).
14. Bryson W.H. (ed.). Cases concerning equity and the courts of equity 1550-1660. Vol. 1. London, Selden Society, 2001. 821 p.
15. Heinze R. Essay on the English judiciary in connection with the jury. St. Petersburg, 1866. 91 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Strizhakov I. The Royal Courts of Equity in England in the 16-17 centuries. Law Enforcement Review. 2017;1(2):38-45. https://doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2017.1(2).38-45