The concept of cyberspace in international law
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).32-44
Abstract
The subject. The article is devoted to the analysis of approaches in the development of the concept of cyberspace in international law.
The purpose of this article is to try to highlight the attributes of cyberspace, which will allow to resolve existing gaps in the field of universal cyber regulation in international law. The research presented in this article was conducted by combining various disciplinary approaches, including comparative law, comparative politics and international relations, political theory, and sociology. In addition, the study includes methods of dialectical logic, analysis and synthesis, as well as a formal-legal analysis of UN international legal acts.
The main results and scope of their application. As states pay increasing attention to cyberspace management as the technical architecture that powers the global Internet and governance in cyberspace, in terms of how states, corporations and users can use this technology, the role of international law in cyberspace is increasing, becoming more prominent, becoming more important. At the same time, note that international law has no specific rules for regulating cyberspace. Moreover, the technology is both new and dynamic. Thus, for several years there have been open questions as to whether existing international law applies at all to cyberspace. Cyberspace is now the backbone of global commerce, communication and defense systems, and is a key aspect of the critical infrastructure that sustains our modern civilization. Technology and information spread almost instantaneously, and the global economy and supply chains are integrated to a degree unprecedented in history. Nevertheless, there is still no developed universal concept of cyberspace in international law, only approaches at the level of the UN, international organizations, including the First Committee of the UN General Assembly on Disarmament and International Security, the G20, the European Union, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and the Organization of American States and doctrinal approaches are singled out.
Conclusions. The competition for strategic technology and the competition for advantage in the "information space" is growing, so far without the standard international rules of the road. Moreover, the future is likely to prove even more transformational. The potential threats are also extraordinary: autonomous weapons, cyber warfare, sophisticated disinformation campaigns and geopolitical instability. In such circumstances, it is crucial to develop a universal notion of cyberspace because of the persistent significant vulnerabilities and number of threats in global communications.
About the Authors
K. A. IvanovaRussian Federation
Ksenia A. Ivanova – PhD in Law; Director, Center of Local Authorities of the Institute of Management and Regional Development, 84, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119571;
Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, 6, Volodarskogo ul., Tyumen, 625003
M. Zh. Myltykbaev
Russian Federation
Madi Zh. Myltykbaev – Post-graduate student, International Law Department,
76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
D. D. Shtodina
Russian Federation
Daria D. Shtodina – Post-graduate student, International Law Department,
76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Choucri N. Cyberpolitics in International Relations. The MIT Press, 2012. 320 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7736.001.0001.
2. Roscini M. World Wide Warfare – Jus ad bellum and the Use of Cyber Force, in: Bogdandy A. Von, Wolfrum R., Philipp C.E. (eds.). Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publ., 2010, vol. 14, pp. 85– 130.
3. Kahin B., Keller J.H. Coordinating the Internet. The MIT Press, 1997. 510 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/2170.001.0001.
4. Krutskikh A.V. International information security: theory and practice, in 3 volumes, 2nd ed. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., 2021. Vol. 1. 384 p. (In Russ.).
5. Ceruzzi P.E. Computing: A Concise History. The MIT Press, 2012. 199 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9426.001. 0001.
6. Srinivasan R. Beyond the Valley: How Innovators around the World are Overcoming Inequality and Creating the Technologies of Tomorrow. The MIT Press, 2019. 424 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11894.001.0001.
7. Biegler S. Beyond Our Control?: Confronting the Limits of Our Legal System in the Age of Cyberspace. The MIT Press, 2003. 472 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1583.001.0001.
8. Lipton J. Rethinking Cyberlaw: A New Vision for Internet Law. Edward Elgar Publishing LTD, 2015. 176 p.
9. Frank H.E. Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse, in: University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1996, pp. 207–216
10. Lessig L. Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York, Basic Books Publ., 1999. 320 p.
11. Krieger H., Nolte G., Zimmermann A. The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019. 378 p. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198843603.001.0001.
12. Delerue F. Cyber Operations and International Law. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020. 549 p. DOI: 10.1017/9781108780605.
13. Khanna P. State Sovereignty and Self-Defence in Cyberspace. BRICS Law Journal, 2018, vol. 5, no 4, pp. 139– 154. DOI: 10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-4-139-154.
14. Vylegzhanin A.N. (ed.). International law, Textbook for universities, in 2 parts. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2021. Pt. 1. 329 p. (In Russ.).
15. Kahin B., Nesson C. Borders in Cyberspace: Information Policy and the Global Information Infrastructure. The MIT Press, 1997. 374 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/1648.001.0001.
16. Jørgensen R.F. Human Rights in the Age of Platforms. The MIT Press, 2019. 392 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11304.001.0001.
17. Schmitt M.N. The Law of Cyber Warfare: Quo Vadis? Stanford Law & Policy Review, 2014, Vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 269–299.
18. Wolff J. You'll See This Message When It Is Too Late: The Legal and Economic Aftermath of Cybersecurity Breaches. The MIT Press, 2018. 336 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11336.001.0001.
19. Nye J.S. Cyber Power. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, May, 2010. 24 p.
20. Coleman S., Shane P.M. Connecting Democracy: Online Consultation and the Flow of Political Communication. The MIT Press, 2011. 416 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9006.001.0001.
21. Wu T.S. Cyberspace Sovereignty? The Internet and the International System. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 1997, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 647–666.
22. Lewis J. Sovereignty and the Role of Government in Cyberspace. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 2010, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 55–65.
23. Adonis A.A. International Law on Cyber Security in the Age of Digital Sovereignty. E-International Relations, Mar 14 2020, available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/03/14/international-law-on-cyber-security-in-the-age-of-digital-sovereignty/.
24. Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. The MIT Press, 2000. 447 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/7105.001.0001.
25. Brown G., Poellet K. The Customary International Law of Cyberspace. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 2012, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 126–145.
26. Barassi V. Child Data Citizen: How Tech Companies Are Profiling Us from Before Birth. The MIT Press, 2020. 232 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/12415.001.0001.
27. Webb M. Coding Democracy: How Hackers Are Disrupting Power, Surveillance, and Authoritarianism. The MIT Press, 2020. 416 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11669.001.0001.
28. Schmitt M.N. Computer Network Attack and the Use of Force in International Law: Thoughts on a Normative Framework. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 1999. 1998–1999, vol. 3, pp. 885–937.
29. Landau S. Surveillance or Security?: The Risks Posed by New Wiretapping Technologies. The MIT Press, 2011. 383 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/8623.001.0001.
30. Henriksen A. The end of the road for the UN GGE process: The future regulation of cyberspace. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2019, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1093/cybsec/tyy009.
31. Jemielniak D., Przegalinska A. Collaborative Society. The MIT Press, 2020. 256 p. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/11587.001.0001.
32. Koh H. H. International Law in Cyberspace. Harvard International Law Journal Online, 2012, vol. 54, pp. 1– 12, available at: https://harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2012/12/Koh-Speech-to-Publish1.pdf (accessed date: 22.11.2022).
Review
For citations:
Ivanova K.A., Myltykbaev M.Zh., Shtodina D.D. The concept of cyberspace in international law. Law Enforcement Review. 2022;6(4):32-44. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2022.6(4).32-44