Genetic resources as an object of international law
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).33-42
Abstract
The article examines whether the legal regime of genetic resources is outlined in the context of applicable rules relating to biological diversity. The purpose of the research is to confute the prospects for the formation of a universal legal regime for genetic resources, in the context of the draft UN Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, and the possibilities of using regional mechanisms in this domain.
The methodology of the research includes the formal legal, comparative, historical, systemic and structural methods. The authors analyze and examine applicable international legal sources, including the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity and its 2010 Nagoya Protocol. On the basis of the systemic and structural method the authors carry out the analysis of the sources of international law related to the conservation and sustainable use of genetic and other biological resources.
The main results. The international community’s interest in genetic resources results from the growing need to take more informed environmental decisions. The relevant universal legal basis, created by the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, does not provide answers to some important questions, including the detailed legal definition of the term “genetic resources”, though the relevant definition contained in the 1992 Convention remains the only one that has been accepted by a large number of states. It is possible that states will be able to develop a more concrete legal rules relating to the genetic resources in the course of negotiating the UN Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. However, the development of such a universal international treaty might require a lot of effort in order to reconcile the divergent interests of states.
Conclusions. Based on the analysis of applicable international law, the authors assert that the generally outlined legal basis for conservation of biodiversity, laid down by the 1992 Convention, demands further detailing in the modern context. The UN process on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction is likely to take considerable efforts of participating actors before the appropriate legal mechanisms are agreed upon. So regional legal regimes might be an appropriate way to ensure the efficient management of genetic resources taking into account peculiarities of each individual region.
About the Authors
A. N. Vylegzhanin
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Vylegzhanin – Doctor of Law, Professor; Head, Department of International Law MGIMO University.
76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
P. V. Sotskova
MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Polina V. Sotskova – PhD student, Department of International Law MGIMO University.
76, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Mirovitskaya N., Ascher W. Guide to Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy. Durham, London, 2001. XXVII + 391 p.
2. Vylegzhanin A.N., Korzhenyak A.M. Sustainable Development Clauses in the International Law of the Sea. Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava = Moscow Journal of International Law, 2022, no. 4, pp. 6–33. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2022-4-6-33. (In Russ.).
3. Aniansson B., Svedin U. Towards an Ecologically Sustainable Economy. Stockholm, Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research Publ., 1990. 144 p.
4. Campbell-Mohn C., Breen B., Futrell W.J. Environmental Law: From Resources to Recovery. West Group Publ., 1993. 994 p.
5. Jaspars M., de Pascale D., Andersen J. H., Reyes F., Crawford A. D., Ianora A. The marine biodiscovery pipeline and ocean medicines of tomorrow. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2016, vol. 96, iss. 1, pp. 151–158. DOI: 10.1017/s0025315415002106.
6. Blasiak R., Wynberg R., Grorud-Colvert K., Thambisetty S., Bandarr N., Canário A.V.M., Silva J. da, Duarte C.M., Jaspars M., Rogers A.D., Sink K., Wabnitz C.C.C. The Ocean Genome: Conservation and the Fair, Equitable and Sustainable Use of Marine Genetic Resources, Blue Paper 4. Washington, DC, World Resources Institute Publ., 2020. 62 p. Available at: http://opus.sanbi.org/bitstream/20.500.12143/7038/1/Blasiak_etal_2020_BluePaper_TheOceanGenome.pdf.
7. Aricò S., Salpin C. Bioprospecting of Genetic Resources in the Deep Seabed: Scientific, Legal and Policy Aspects. Yokohama, United Nations University Publ., 2005. 76 p.
8. Gureev S.A. (ed.). International Maritime Law. Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ., 2003. 448 p. (In Russ.).
9. Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition. St. Paul, Minn., West Publishing CO, 1990. 1657 p.
10. De Lucia V. The Concept of Commons and Marine Genetic Resources in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Marine Safety and Security Law Journal, 2018–2019, iss. 5: Special Issue on Ocean Commons, available at: https://www.marsafelawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/MarSafeLawJournal_Issue5_DeLucia.pdf.
11. Harden-Davies H. Marine genetic resources beyond national jurisdiction: an integrated approach to benefit-sharing, conservation and sustainable use, Doctor of Philosophy thesis. Australian National Centre for Ocean Resources and Security, University of Wollongong Publ., 2018. xxi + 380 p.
12. Atkinson G., Bateman I., Mourato S. Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity, in: Helm D., Hepburn C. (eds.). Nature in the Balance: The Economics of Biodiversity, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 101–150.
13. Schei P.J., Tvedt M.W. “Genetic Resources” in the CBD: The Wording, the Past, the Present and the Future, FNI Report 4/2010. Fridtjof Nansen Institute Publ., 2010. 24 p.
14. Vylegzhanin A.N. Marine Biodiversity and International Law. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2001, no. 3, pp. 69–81. (In Russ.).
15. Birnie P.W., Boyle A.E. Environmental Law and the Environment. Oxford, 1992. XXVII + 563 p.
16. Bulgakov M.B., Jalbuganov A.A. Environmental Regulations: from “the Russkaya Pravda” to the era of Peter the Great. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 1996, no. 8, pp. 136–146. (In Russ.).
17. Kolbasov O.S. International Environmental Law on the Verge of the 21st Century, in: Kolodkin A.L. (ed.). Pervaya Konferentsiya Vsemirnoi assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava v Rossii (1997), Novorossiysk, 1999, pp. 120–135. (In Russ.).
18. Bowman M., Redgwell C. (eds.). International law and the conservation of biological diversity. London, Boston, Kluwer Law International Publ., 1996. xiv + 334 p.
19. Young O.R. Addressing the Grand Challenges of Planetary Governance. Cambridge University Press, 2023. 58 p.
20. Klein C. New Leadership Needed: The Convention on Biological Diversity. Emory International Law Review 2019, vol. 31, iss. 1, pp. 135–165.
21. Broggiato A., Vanagt T., Lallier L.E., Jaspars M., Burton G., Muyldermans D. Mare Geneticum: Balancing Governance of Marine Genetic Resources in International Waters. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2018, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3–33. DOI: 10.1163/15718085-13310030.
22. Tvedt M.W. Marine Genetic Resources: a Practical Legal Approach to Stimulate Research, Conser-vation and Benefit Sharing, in: Banet C. (ed.). The Law of the Seabed: Access, Uses, and Protection of Seabed Resources, Publications on Ocean Development; Vol. 90, Leiden, Boston, Brill Nijhoff Publ., 2020, pp. 238–254. DOI: 0.1163/9789004391567_013.
23. Correa C.M. Access to and Benefit Sharing of Marine Genetic Resources Beyond National Jurisdiction. Developing a New Legally Binding Instrument. Geneva, South Center Publ., 2017. 29 p.
24. Mossop J. Towards a Practical Approach to Regulating Marine Genetic Resources. ESIL Reflections, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 3, available at: https://esil-sedi.eu/esil-reflection-towards-a-practical-approach-to-regulating-marine-genetic-resources/.
25. Korn H., Friedrich S., Feit U. Deep Sea Genetic Resources in the Context of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, BfN Skript 79. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Publ., 2003. 83 p.
26. Allen C. Protecting the Oceanic Gardens of Eden: International Law Issues in Deep Sea Vent Resources Conservation and Management. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 2001, Vol. 13, pp. 563–660.
27. Mossop J. The Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: Rights and Responsibilities. Oxford University Press, 2016. 310 p.
28. Leary D. International Law and the Genetic Resources of the Deep Sea. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007. Xvii + 301 p.
29. Oude Elferink A.G. The Regime of the Area: Delineating the Scope of Application of the Common Heritage Principle and the Freedom of the High Seas. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 2007, vol. 22, iss. 7, pp. 143–176. DOI: 10.1163/157180807781475272.
30. Scovazzi T. The Negotiations for a Binding Instrument on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity Beyond National Jurisdiction. Marine Policy, 2016, no. 70, pp. 188–191. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.007.
Review
For citations:
Vylegzhanin A.N., Sotskova P.V. Genetic resources as an object of international law. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(1):33-42. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).33-42
Views:
457
Email this article 