Problems of calculation of the terms of appeals of decisions made in the order of summary proceedings
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).124-133
Abstract
The subject of the research is the features of the appeal of court decisions in cases considered in summary proceedings.
The methodology. Analysis and synthesis, dialectical method as well as formal legal interpretation of Russian legislative acts.
The main results. The author critically assesses the provisions of the procedural legislation, focuses on the problems that exist in practice. (1) There is a different procedure for notifying a decision adopted as a result of summary proceedings, according to the norms of the Civil Procedure Code and of the Arbitration Procedure Code. (2) It is concluded that the dependence of the beginning of the period for filing an application for drawing up a reasoned decision on the day of placement of the operative part of the decision or on the day of its adoption significantly complicates the timely implementation of such a right. A different construction will be justified and practically convenient: fixing in the law a single moment of the beginning of the period for an appeal against a decision - from the moment a copy of the operative part is delivered (irrespective of the application for drawing up a reasoned decision). (3) If the deadline for filing an application for the preparation of a reasoned decision is missed, the issue of its restoration should be resolved only if the deadline for filing an appeal has not been missed. If the deadline for filing an appeal is missed, then a reasoned decision on the case should be made only if the specified dead-line is restored.
Recommendations are offered on the possible improvement of procedural rules on summary proceedings. In particular, the issue of increasing the period for applying for a reasoned decision was raised. It is proposed that the start time for filing an application for the preparation of a reasoned decision be determined from the day a copy of the decision is handed over to the persons participating in the case, or the decision is posted on the court's website.
Conclusions. The identified problems call into question the merits of the summary procedure, show in practice its difficult and complicated order. The existing model of summary proceedings needs to be significantly detailed in order to increase the guarantees of judicial protection.
About the Author
N. G. Galkovskaya
Тomsk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya G. Galkovskaya – PhD in Law, Associate Professor; Head, Department of Civil Procedure Tomsk State University.
36, Lenina pr., Tomsk, 634050
AuthorID: 770185
References
1. Gromoshina N.A. Differentiation and unification in civil proceedings, Doct. Diss. Thesis. Moscow, 2010. 50 p. (In Russ.).
2. Staritsyn A.Yu. Summary Proceedings in Civil and Arbitral Procedures. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2021, no. 11, pp. 29–32. DOI: 10.18572/1812-383X-2021-11-29-32. (In Russ.).
3. Tsaregorodtseva E.A. Reformation of Summary Proceedings: Aims and Results. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2020, no. 11, pp. 29–31. DOI: 10.18572/1812-383X-2020-11-29-31. (In Russ.).
4. Yarkova V.V. (ed.). Current problems of civil and administrative proceedings. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2021. 460 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kukhareva O.A., Yusupova A.N. Simplified Forms of the Review and Resolution of Cases Within the Framework of the Unification of a Civil Judicial Procedure. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2020, no. 5, pp. 27–31. DOI: 10.18572/1812-383X-2020-5-27-31. (In Russ.).
6. Dolotin R.R. Study of the Procedural Form of Simplified Proceedings in the Context of the Problem of Implementation of the Principle of Procedural Economy. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, no. 3, pp. 212–223. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-212-223. (In Russ.).
7. Sherstyuk V.M. Categories of reality and possibility in civil procedure. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 6, pp. 10–32. (In Russ.).
8. Shvarts M.Z. Systematization of Arbitration Procedural Legislation (Problems of Theory and Practice of Application), Cand. Diss. Thesis. St. Petersburg, 2004. 26 p. (In Russ.).
9. Papulova Z.A. Accelerated Forms of Consideration of Cases in Civil Proceedings. Moscow, Infotropic Media Publ., 2014. 184 p. (In Russ.).
10. Galkovskaya N.G. Results of the Reform of Simplified Proceedings in Arbitration Proceedings. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Journal, 2014, no. 382, pp. 144–151. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/382/24. (In Russ.).
11. Terekhova L.A. Peculiarities of Appealing of Court Orders and Judgments in Summary Proceedings Cases. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 11, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.).
12. Sherstiuk V.M. Direct Links between Proceedings in the Court of First Instance and Proceedings on the Revision of Judicial Acts in Civil Procedure. Sovremennoe pravo, 2018, no. 2, pp. 55–60. (In Russ.).
13. Smagina E.S. Problems of summary proceedings in civil proceedings. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2016, no. 9, pp. 57–63. (In Russ.).
14. Knyazkin S.I. Issues of Verification in a Civil Procedure of Judgments Made in Simplified Proceedings. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 2, pp. 59–64. (In Russ.).
15. Sakhnova T.V. “Incomplete” Court Procedures in Modern Civil Procedure. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, no. 4, pp. 27–49. DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-4-27-49. (In Russ.).
16. Osipova L.V. Summary proceedings in arbitration courts under Federal law dated 02.03.2016 No. 45-FZ and No. 47-FZ: some problems of legal regulation. Vestnik arbitrazhnoi praktiki, 2016, no. 2, pp. 14–19. (In Russ.).
17. Timofeev Yu.A. Procedural Means of Optimization in Summary Proceedings. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 11, pp. 21–25. (In Russ.).
18. Prikhod’ko I.A. Changes in writ and simplified proceedings and their application (commentary to the Resolutions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 27, 2016 No. 62 and of April 18, 2017 No. 10). 2017. Available at ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.).
19. Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Commentary on the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, article-by-article, 4th ed. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2020. 1071 p. (In Russ.).
20. Masalagiu R.M. Simplified Procedure in Civil and Arbitrazh Procedures: Is Everything Done Correctly? Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2017, no. 9, pp. 36–41. (In Russ.).
21. Abakumova S.S., Kotlov R.E. The institution of restoration of procedural terms in the arbitration process as a guarantee of the rights of persons participating in the case. Arbitrazhnye spory, 2019, no. 4, pp. 91–102. (In Russ.).
22. Dimitriev M.A. Comment to the Federal Law of March 2, 2016 No. 47-FZ “On Amendments to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”, Federal Law of March 2, 2016 No. 45-FZ “On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation”. 2016. Available at ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.).
23. Borisova E. Appeal on a Judgment Delivered through Simplified Procedure. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 76–86. (In Russ.).
24. Makeeva E.B. Advantages and Disadvantages of Summary Proceedings in an Arbitral Procedure. A Practitioner’s View. Rossiiskii sud'ya = Russian Judge, 2020, no. 12, pp. 20–24. DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2020-12-20-24. (In Russ.).
25. Fedyaev D.A. Summary Procedure in Civil and Commercial Proceedings: Unification or Differentiation of Statutory Rules. Permskii yuridicheskii al'manakh = Perm Legal Almanac, 2018, no. 1, pp. 391–399. (In Russ.).
26. Kurenova D.D. Current problems of summary proceedings in civil procedure. Yustitsiya = Justice, 2018, no. 4, pp. 15–19. (In Russ.).
27. Reshetnikova I.V. Novelties in the legal regulation of summary and writ proceedings in arbitrazh procedure. Zakon, 2016, no. 9, pp. 100–106. (In Russ.).
28. Baturina N.A. Peculiarities of Appeal Proceedings in Cases Reviewed Summarily. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 11, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.).
29. Zhuikov V.M. (ed.). Problems of development of procedural law in Russia, Monograph. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2016. 223 p. (In Russ.).
30. Sivak N.V. Summary Proceedings in Arbitration Procedure, Monograph. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2011. 136 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Galkovskaya N.G. Problems of calculation of the terms of appeals of decisions made in the order of summary proceedings. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(1):124-133. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).124-133
Views:
435
Email this article 