Child's legal personality: actualization of opportunities and their limitations

The subject of this research is the concept of a child’s legal capacity in an interdisciplinary context and the validity of various approaches for determining the essence and scope of a child’s legal capacity in terms of Russian public and private legislation and to provide suggestions for improvement.

Methodology: The authors’ general research methods for cognition are: analysis, synthesis, and abstraction. This research is also based on legal acts and judicial practice, as well as on the opinions of scientists.

Results: On the one hand, differentiations in terms of the essence, structure and scope of a child’s legal capacity within the branches of Russian law are justified according to the specifics of their subject and methods of legal regulation. On the other hand, the differences in approaches presented in them, especially according to age criterion, are far from universally justified, and this is especially characteristic of the active component of legal personality – or legal capacity. Thus, 14 and 16 are the ages of legal capacity in terms of constitutional law; 6, 14 and 16 for civil law; 14, 15 and 16 for labour law; 15 for medical law; 10, 14, 15, 16 for family law; etc. The law on education does not indicate any age benchmarks, being oriented towards the school education periods. At the same time, the lower boundaries of ‘minimal legal capacity’ are established only for the sake of civil legal relations and administrative and criminal liability. In other cases, in the assessment of a child’s ability to make legally significant decisions, the law enforcement officer considers a child’s individual psychological characteristics. Typically this approach proves to be correct. Psychological data indicate the development of an acceptable level of cognitive ability by the age of 12; therefore, the formally enshrined concept of child consent to certain legally significant acts beginning at the age of 10 requires discussion and possible adjustment. The ages of 14 and 16 as starting points for basic elements of the legal capacity (legal personality) are reasonable and must be applied systematically; other intermediate solutions are not justified. In terms of a generally correct decision with regard to the moment when the age of legal capacity begins, it would be reasonable to correlate this with the protection of a child’s interests before his/her birth. There is no unified approach to understanding a child’s ability to perform legal duties: in civil law such ability is denied, while in other legal spheres it exists. As for family law, it should be assimilated into the general group. Conclusions: the concept of a child’s legal capacity requires systematization and enhancement as a prerequisite for a reasonable and justified arrangement of children's world – both within the family and in the public sphere.

1. Letova N., Kozhokar I. Legal status of a child in family legislation of the Russian Federation and CIS: comparative legal analysis. Russian Law Journal, 2019, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 82–106. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-82-106.

2. Nechaeva A. Protection of family rights of the child and protection of his childhood. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2018, no. 7, pp. 91–98. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690000225-9. (In Russ.).

3. Tarusina N. European experience and national traditions in Russian family law. Russian Law Journal, 2015, vol. III, iss. 2, pp. 97–108. DOI: 10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-2-97-108.

4. Tarusina N., Isaeva E. Russian family legislation: revolution, counter-revolution, evolution. BRICS Law Journal, 2017, vol. 4, iss. 4, pp. 65–92.

5. Temnikova N.A. Determination and classification of family personal non-property rights of the child. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo” = Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2010, no. 2 (23), pp. 82–89. (In Russ.).

6. Besedkina N.I. Rights of the unborn child. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2006, no. 4, pp. 54–60. (In Russ.).

7. Nevzgodina E.L. Representation. Civil law aspect. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2007. 552 p. (In Russ.).

8. Tarasova A.E. Legal personality of citizens. Features of the legal personality of minors, their manifestation in civil relations, Monograph. Moscow, Walters Kluver Publ., 2008. 320 p. (In Russ.).

9. Zajceva A.M. Beginning of human life as a boundary of the constitutional legal capacity. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2012, no. 10, pp. 17–25. (In Russ.).

10. Kazannik A.I., Kostyukov A.N. (eds.). Constitutional law, university course, in 2 volumes. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2016. Vol. II. 480 p. (In Russ).

11. Evstifeev D.M. Legal personality of minors as an element of the constitutional status of individuals. Voprosy upravleniya = Management Issues, 2014, no. 3, pp. 219–225. (In Russ.).

12. Sitkova O.Yu. The Legal Nature of the Child’s Right to Access Information and the Restriction Thereof to Protect a Child Against Information Detrimental to the Mental Health and Development of Minors. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and Housing Law, 2021, no. 1, pp. 27–30. DOI: 10.18572/1999-477H-2021-1-27-30. (In Russ.).

13. Ivanova K.A., Myltykbaev M.Zh. The freedom of speech and right of access to information in the emerging system of international information security. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 80–93. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(4).80-93. (In Russ.).

14. Nudnenko L.A. Tendencies of the development of human constitutional rights and freedoms on the modern stage of the development of the Russian Federation. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2019, no. 9, pp. 52–55. (In Russ.).

15. Salenko A.V. Freedom of peaceful assembly: “children’s meetings” and “adult sanctions”. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 8, pp. 48–61. DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.8.5. (In Russ.).

16. Hart R.A. Children’s participation: from tokenism to citizenship, lnnocenti Essays; No. 4. Florence, UNICEF International Child Development Centre Publ., 1992. 39 p.

17. Avakyan S.A. The information space of knowledge, digital world and constitutional law. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2019, no. 7, pp. 23–28. (In Russ.).

18. Simonova S.V. Children’s cyber security: substantive and procedural aspects. Sotsial'no-yuridicheskaya tetrad', 2020, no. 10, pp. 26–37. (In Russ.).

19. Lushnikov A.M., Lushnikova M.V. Labor law. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2021. 768 p. DOI: 10.31085/9785392335213-2021-768. (In Russ.).

20. Kravchuk N. The right of the child to express their views in the context of Russian culture and democracy. Russian Law Journal, 2014, vol. II, iss. 3, pp. 23–48.

21. Osokina G.L. Course of Civil Procedure of Russia. Tomsk, Tomsk University Publ., 2002. 616 p. (In Russ.).

22. Ionova D.Yu., Kazikhanova S.K. Actual problems of judicial protection of the rights of minors under the age of fourteen. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, 2021, no. 8, pp. 42–48. (In Russ.).

23. Oshevsky D.S., Terekhina S.A., Dozortseva E.G., Badmaeva V.D., Chibisova I.A., Syrokvashina K.V., Aleksandrova N.A. Clinical and psychological aspects of the expert evaluation of competency to stand trial in juvenile offenders. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 226–239. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080316. (In Russ.).

24. Smirnova A.R. Responsibility as the highest mental function of personality on the example of the concept of L.S. Vygotsky. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2020, no. 2, pp. 1–10, available at: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/09PSMN220.pdf. (In Russ.).

25. Viljoen J.L., Roesch R. Competence to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms. Law and Human Behavior, 2005, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 723–742. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-005-7978-y.

26. Elkonin D.B. Introduction to child psychology, in: Elkonin D.B. Selected psychological works, Moscow, Pedagogika Publ., 1989, pp. 26–60. (In Russ).

27. Ioffe O.S. Soviet civil law, vol. 3. Moscow, 1965. 495 p. (In Russ).

28. Matveeva N.A. The Institution of Child’s Obligations in Laws of Foreign Countries. Semeinoe i zhilishchnoe pravo = Family and Housing Law, 2020, no. 6, pp. 25–28. DOI: 10.18572/1999-477Х-2020-6-25-28. (In Russ.).

29. Borisova S.E. Legal socialization of personality. Psikhologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law, 2016, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 5–15. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2016060402. (In Russ.).

30. Tarusina N.N. Age as a Legal Fact in the Family Sphere: Temptations and Conventionality of the Number of Years. Lex russica, 2022, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 17–32. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2022.191.10.017-032. (In Russ.).