The concept of the development of the mechanism of reputational responsibility of the organization within the framework of a new model of scientific attestation
https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).34-44
Abstract
The subject of the study is the concept of developing a mechanism for the reputational responsibility of organizations endowed with the rights provided for in paragraph 3.1 of Article 4 of the Federal Law from August 23, 1996 No. 127-FZ "On Science and State Scientific and Technical Policy".
The purpose of the article is to propose specific tools for the implementation of the mechanism of reputational responsibility of organizations with the right to independently award academic degrees. The article examines the method of self-examination of the certification model of the organization, indicators of its effectiveness, and also provides proposals for the development of indicators for monitoring the activities of dissertation councils of organizations with the right to independently award academic degrees.
The use of general logical research methods, including analysis and synthesis, the formal legal and comparative legal methods, allowed the authors to come to the following conclusions: (1) for the effective conduct of self-examination in each organization, it is advisable to adopt local regulations that approve the regulation on the procedure for conducting selfexamination and the report on the conduct of self-examination; (2) the list of information and data given in the article to be assessed during self-examination is exemplary, and can be expanded taking into account the characteristics of a scientific or educational organization; (3) organizations can be recommended to distribute digests about the dissertations defended, their real contribution to the development of science to leading educational and scientific organizations, and post them in free access on the official website of the organization. They may also contain information about self-examination and monitoring of dissertation councils, scientific attestation processes, other information that contributes to the formation of a stable positive image of the organization, the scientific community's trust in its certification model. It is substantiated that, within the framework of the new model of scientific attestation, the development of the institution of reputational responsibility of organizations with the right to independently award scientific degrees is the key to ensuring the quality of reproducible scientific personnel.
About the Authors
S. V. Narutto
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Narutto – Doctor of Law, Professor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law
9, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya ul., Moscow, 127434
AuthorID: 392890
A. V. Bodrov
Kazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrei V. Bodrov – PhD in Chemistry; Head, Department of Education and Methodology; Associate Professor, Department of General and Organic Chemistry
49, Butlerova ul., Kazan, 420012
AuthorID: 742648
References
1. Reznik S.D., Yudina T.A. The Reputational Liability of a Higher Education Institution: Problems, Experience, Prospects. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 1, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.).
2. Kolodkin L.M., Nechevin D.K. Formation and Development of Legal Institute of Certification of Scholars and Pedagogical Staff. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 2016, no. 1 (92), pp. 350–358. (In Russ.).
3. Matskevich I.M., Matskevich O.V., Tsaregradskaya Yu.K. Put in a Word for the Poor Scientist... On Decency in Science. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2019, no. 8, pp. 6–13. (In Russ.).
4. Gracheva E.Yu. Current Issues of the Scientific Expertise of Dissertation Legal Researches. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2019, no. 7, pp. 14–20. (In Russ.).
5. Yastrebov O.A. Modern Procedures of Defence of Dissertation Research. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2019, no. 7, pp. 48–49. (In Russ.).
6. Matskevich I.M., Shengelia G.A. Ten Most Typical Violations in Preparation of Qualification Files of Degree Seeking Students. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2020, no. 1, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.).
7. Mokhov A.A. Elements of Self-Regulation in Science. Grazhdanskoe pravo = Civil Law, 2020, no. 2, pp. 26– 29. (In Russ.).
8. Bekin A.V., Zbaratskiy B.A. Problems of implementation of principles of transparency and accessibility in the system of scientific personnel certification in the Russian Federation. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 16, no. 4 (125), pp. 11–22. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2021.125.4.011-022. (In Russ.).
9. Zenin S.S., Bekin A.V., Zbaratskiy B.A. Some Issues of the Implementation of Publicity and Availability Principles in the System of Performance Review of Academic Personnel in the Russian Federation. Gosudarstvennaya vlast' i mestnoe samoupravlenie = State Power and Local Self-government, 2021, no. 2, pp. 11–15. (In Russ.).
10. Pakhomov S.I., Petrov M.P., Abalakin K.S., Matskevich I.M. Right to one’s degree. Reflections on the first experience of independent academic degree awarding by leading scientific and educational centers and pressing challenges of the country’s scientific certification system development. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today, 2019, no. 8, pp. 2–12. DOI: 10.25586/RNU.HET.19.08.P.02. (In Russ.).
11. Narutto S. Democratic Tendencies in the New Model of the State System of Scientific Promotion and Issues of Preserving a Unified Legal Space. Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya = Bulletin of the Academy of Law and Management, 2019, no. 1 (54), pp. 124–130. (In Russ.).
12. Narutto S.V., Bodrov A.V. On the Expediency of Simplification of the Procedure for Approval of the List of Scientific Majors. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2021, no. 1, pp. 17–23. (In Russ.).
13. Narutto S.V., Shugrina E.S. On authorizing universities to award their own degrees. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2016, no. 1 (62), pp. 221–225. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2016.62.1.221-225. (In Russ.).
14. Narutto S.V. The nomenclature of scientific specialties and the new model of award of academic degrees: Russian experience. Pravoprimenenie = Law Enforcement Review, 2019, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–32. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2019.3(1).24-32. (In Russ.).
15. Bodrov A.V., Narutto S.V. An Academic Degree: On the Determination of the Branch of Science. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2019, no. 10, pp. 6–14. (In Russ.).
16. Gabov А.V. State System of Scientific Attestation as a Subject of Legal Regulation in the Post-Soviet Time. Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii = Methodological Problems of the Civil Law Researches, 2020, no. 2, pp. 48–88. (In Russ.).
17. Gabov A., Matskevich I. The nomenclature of scientific specialties as an element of the government system of academic performance assessment: raising the issue. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya = Monitoring of Law Enforcement, 2020, no. 2 (35), pp. 18–28. (In Russ.).
18. Gabov A.V., Kolotova N.V. Remote participation in the defense of dissertations. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2021, no. 4, pp. 35–49. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014348-3. (In Russ.).
19. Gabov A.V., Kasprova Yu.A., Lykianova I.N. Associated Dissertation Councils in System of State Scientific Attestation. Zakonodatelstvo, 2019, no. 9, pp. 73–78. (In Russ.).
20. Gabov A.V. On Criteria for Thesis Researches in Organizations Having Received the Right to Award Academic Degrees on a Standalone Basis. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2019, no. 11, pp. 3–15. (In Russ.).
21. Pakhomov S.I., Matskevich I.M., Gurtov V.A., Melekh N.V., Zaugolnikova E.I. Efficiency of Organizations Entitled to Award Academic Degrees. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education, 2020, no. 1 (98), pp. 111– 143. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.098.024.202001.111-143. (In Russ.).
22. Pakhomov S.I. The System of State Scientific Qualification: Issues and Development Prospects. Yuridicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka = Juridical Education and Science, 2019, no. 7, pp. 3–9. (In Russ.).
23. Dyatlov A.V., Kovalev V.V., Vodenko K.V. Independent Awarding of Academic Degrees: Problems and Prospects. Vestnik Yuzhno-Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (NPI). Seriya: Sotsial'noekonomicheskiye nauki = Bulletin of the South-Russian State Technical University (NPI). Series: Socio-Economic Sciences, 2021, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 171–179. (In Russ.).
24. Pakhomov S.I., Gurtov V.A., Stasevich A.V. Dissertation Councils’ Indicators Dynamics in the Road Map Implementation. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2019, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 21–31. DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2019.04.026. (In Russ.).
25. Bodrov A.V. On the Issue of the Nomenclature of Scientific Specialties in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Sovremennye problemy zdravookhraneniya i meditsinskoi statistiki = Current Problems of Health Care and Medical Statistics, 2021, no. 1, pp. 142–157. DOI: 10.24411/2312-2935-2021-00008. (In Russ.).
26. Pakhomov S.I., Kulyamin O.V., Gurtov V.A., Shchegoleva L.V. The Criterial Indicators of Universities for Granting to Them the Right to Award Academic Degrees. Universitetskoe upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2017, vol. 21, no. 6 (112), pp. 19–27. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Narutto S.V., Bodrov A.V. The concept of the development of the mechanism of reputational responsibility of the organization within the framework of a new model of scientific attestation. Law Enforcement Review. 2023;7(3):34-44. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).34-44
Views:
314
Email this article 