Preview

Law Enforcement Review

Advanced search

Nesmeyanova S.E. Levels (centers) of public authority: modern interpretation of theory and practice

https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(2).53-62

Abstract

The subject of the study is the legal relations arising from the public authority’s organization and its levels’ interaction after the constitutional reform of 2020. The organized interaction of the public authority levels determines the effectiveness of this system itself. Nowadays the issue of coordinated interaction between levels (centers) of public authority has become important, especially considering new global challenges in the different spheres. Therefore, the public authority and its levels as well as its organization and interaction become the subject of the legal theory and serve as a catalyst for legal changes, including constitutional one.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the concept of public authority and analyze different approaches to the levels of it in theory and practice, paying the attention to the municipal level and its twofold role.

Methodology. Formal-logical, comparative-legal, analysis methods were used. The interaction of levels of public authority is considered from the point of view of dialogism. This approach allows to establish that the interaction between levels of the public authority can be regarded as full only if they are organizationally isolated and financial and decision-making independent.

Main results. The authors demonstrate the vitality of the theory that predetermined the ongoing changes in the Russian legal system, and examine approaches to the concept of public authority and its levels. It is however apparent that the created system does not include the level of community public authority. Based on the analysis of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the evolution of levels of public authority in their interaction with each other is revealed. Besides, certain elements of centralization of public administration are essentially opposed to the principle of subsidiarity, the analysis of which is also presented in the paper since it determines the scope of competence of public legal entities and allows achieving maximum freedom and efficiency of the activities of bodies. At last, the authors give characteristics to the municipal level by two opposing trends: globalization and glocalization.

Conclusions. In Russia the practice of organizing public authority does not fully comply with the principle of subsidiarity as well as the new legal term of the system of public authority does not include all the variety of elements that the constitutional scientists mentioned, including the community public authority. This one along with the municipal authority level assessed as a potential matter for further reforms necessary for the formation of a trust of public authorities and for the population’s participation in state affairs.

About the Authors

A. V. Bleshchik
Ural State Law University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Bleshchik – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional law; AuthorID: 1105849.

21, Komsomol’skaya ul., Yekaterinburg, 620137



A. G. Kalinina
Ural State Law University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina G. Kalinina – PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional law; AuthorID: 961063.

21, Komsomol’skaya ul., Yekaterinburg, 620137



S. E. Nesmeyanova
Ural State Law University
Russian Federation

Svetlana E. Nesmeyanova – Doctor of Law, Professor; Professor, Department of Constitutional law; AuthorID: 394566.

21, Komsomol’skaya ul., Yekaterinburg, 620137



References

1. Popova N.F. The need for digitization of public administration in the Russian Federation. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess = Administrative Law and Procedure, 2020, no. 2, pp. 48–53. (In Russ.).

2. Kokotov A.N. (ed.). Issues of theory and practice of public authority, Collective monograph. Yekaterinburg, Ural State Academy of Law Publ., 2005. 232 p. (In Russ.).

3. Chirkin V.E. Public legal formation. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2019. 336 p. (In Russ.).

4. Avak’yan S.A. Constitutional law of Russia. Educational course, Teaching aid, in 2 volumes, 5th ed. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2020. 912 p. (In Russ.).

5. Dobrynin N.M. The people's governance and the sovereignty within the contemporary paradigm of the Russian constitutionalism: to the 10th anniversary of publication of “the starting point is the nation” by professor S.A. Avakyan. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2017, no. 7, pp. 22–33. (In Russ.).

6. Avak’yan S.A. (ed.). Modern problems of organizing public authority. Moscow, Yustitsinform Publ., 2014. 596 p. (In Russ.).

7. Ebzeev B.S. The People, popular sovereignty and representation: doctrinal basis and constitutional practice. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2016, no. 4, pp. 32–44. (In Russ.).

8. Miguschenko O.N. The rule of the people and the unified public government system. Munitsipal’naya sluzhba: pravovye voprosy = Municipal Service: legal issues, 2022, no. 2, pp. 5–10. (In Russ.).

9. Kokotov A.N. Confidence. Mistrust. Law, Monograph, reprint. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2023. 192 p. (In Russ.).

10. Kireeva E.Yu., Nudnenko L.A. Constitutional law grounds for the interaction between local self-government authorities and government authorities in the public government system. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2022, no. 3, pp. 62–67. (In Russ.).

11. Avakyan S.A. Local self-government as a form of public authority: constitutional expectations and real structures. Yuridicheskii mir = Juridical World, 2020, no. 1, pp. 15–20. (In Russ.).

12. Kozhevnikov O.A. Local self-government bodies in the new structure of the unified system of public authority: issues of regulatory regulation. Vestnik Belgorodskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii imeni I.D. Putilina = Vestnik of Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia, 2022, no. 1, pp. 69–73. (In Russ.).

13. Romanenko K.E. The state council in the system of public authority of the Russian Federation. Zakon i pravo = Law & Legislation, 2022, no. 11, pp. 49–55. (In Russ.).

14. Chuklin A.V. On the issue of arrangement of public authority in the federal territory. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2021, no. 10, pp. 11–14. (In Russ.).

15. Onoprienko L.A. The principle of subsidiarity and its reflection in the social doctrine of the Catholic Church. PolitBook, 2014, no. 3, pp. 178–191. (In Russ.).

16. Vydrin I.V., Emikh V.V. Principle of subsidiarity in organization of self-government in Russia and Poland. Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk = Research Yearbook Institute of Philosophy and Law Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 2, pp. 71–99. (In Russ.).

17. Pimenova O.I. Subsidiarity as a moral, philosophical and legal category. Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of the Russian Law, 2017, no. 11 (84), pp. 37–47. (In Russ.).

18. Pimenova O.I. Federalism and subsidiarity in the system of internal government relations: certain theoretical and practical aspects of their interaction (using the example of the Russian Federation). Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2017, no. 4, pp. 5–16. (In Russ.).

19. Malysheva A. Review of cases considered by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The case on checking the constitutionality of certain provisions of the Charter of the Kursk Region as amended by the Law of the Kursk Region of March 22, 1999 “On Amendments and Additions to the Charter of the Kursk Region”. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenie = East European Constitutional Review, 2000, no. 4 (33), pp. 212–213. (In Russ.).

20. Vitruk N. The constitutional principle of “loyalty to the federation” in the practice of the Con stitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeiskoe obozrenie = East European Constitutional Review, 2003, no. 3 (44), pp. 22–38. (In Russ.).

21. Shugrina E.S. Municipal Law, Textbook, 5th ed. Moscow, Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ., 2014. 576 p. (In Russ.).

22. Vydrin I.V. "Efficient performance of the municipal government requires clearly defined functions and powers": interview with A.M. Chernetsky. Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie = Municipality: economics and management, 2019, no. 3 (28), pp. 5–10. (In Russ.).

23. Shaikhullin M.S. Constitutional and legal guarantees for the development of local self-government and the main criteria for their classification. Ufimskii gumanitarnyi nauchnyi forum = Ufa humanitarian scientific forum, 2021, no. 3 (7), pp. 237–249. (In Russ.).

24. Richard B., Stoker J. (eds.). Local government in Europe: trends and developments (Government Beyond the Centre), Basingstoke, UK, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 1991. 253 p.

25. Chebotarev G.N. Municipal government in the single public government system. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2022, no. 1, pp. 57–60. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Bleshchik A.V., Kalinina A.G., Nesmeyanova S.E. Nesmeyanova S.E. Levels (centers) of public authority: modern interpretation of theory and practice. Law Enforcement Review. 2024;8(2):53-62. https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(2).53-62

Views: 293


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-1514 (Print)
ISSN 2658-4050 (Online)